Skip to content
Weigle Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Weigle Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$167kReligion$123kRecreation & Sports$89kAnimals$67kEducation$66kHealth$38kArts & Culture$29kYouth Development$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$1,250
Median grant
7
States reached
$170k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Emanuel$32,125
QC Golf Classic Charitable Foundation$14,100
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Palm Springs Opera Guild$5,525
Palm Springs Pathfinders$5,000
Human Rights Campaign Foundation$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,650
Friends Academy$2,500
First Tee of the Quad Cities$1,400
Jewish Federation of the QC$1,250
River Bend Food Resovior$1,000
Crop Walk Davenport IA$500
Overflow 912$500
Bettendorf Public Library Fndn$500
St Jude Childrens Research Hospital$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAFE ON VINE: $1k → 12%CAFE ON VINE: $1k → 12%CAFE ON VINE: $600 → 12%Overflow 912: $500 → 11%MILESTONES AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $100 → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $170 → 11%Hand in Hand: $100 → 12%HandinHand: $50 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 35 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
73

Total granted

$513k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+12%

Still filing today

49%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DAP Health Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +632%
  • Washington and Lee University
    6× · 2017–2022 · $31k · revenue +15%
  • PS
    PALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $12k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • QC
    QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue +27%
  • QC
    QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
2
Quad Cities Community Foundation

Transforming our region through the generosity of our donors

Philanthropy
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
5
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Iowa Credit Union Foundation

Founded in 1995 as the philanthropic arm of the iowa credit union league and guided by the credit union philosophy of "people helping people", the iowa credit union foundation (the foundation) works to champion financial well-being for…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends Academy; the most unlike its peers is Overflow 912. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
33/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE EMANUEL: $117,890 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELUNITED WAY OF THE QC: $114,100 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE QCBIRDIES FOR CHARITY: $60,950 · OtherBIRDIES FOR CHARITYQC Golf Classic Charitable Foundation: $38,200 · OtherQC Golf Classic Charitable FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherPalm Springs Opera Guild: $20,245 · OtherJewish Federation of the Quad Cities: $17,800 · Other+84 more: $126,802 · Other+84 moreWashington and Lee University: $31,000 · EducationFRIENDS ACADEMY: $8,950 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · Education+3 more: $1,375 · EducationQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $27,200 · PhilanthropyPALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC: $12,040 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,200 · Philanthropy+4 more: $646 · PhilanthropyDAP Health Inc: $33,200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,695 · Health+5 more: $1,500 · HealthHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil RightsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsCAFE ON VINE: $2,600 · Human ServicesOVERFLOW 912: $500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $170 · Human ServicesHAND IN HAND: $150 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human Services
Other$516,987Education$46,325Philanthropy$46,086Health$37,395Civil Rights$5,000Animals$5,000Human Services$3,520

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAP Health Inc: $33,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $27,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Federation of the Quad Cities: $17,800 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $13,650 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC: $12,040 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFRIENDS ACADEMY: $8,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,695 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE ON VINE: $2,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetQUAD CITIES LIFE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT: $2,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Palm Springs: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetQUAD CITY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETTENDORF PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $850 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP SHALOM INC: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMPOWERING ABILITIES: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERFLOW 912: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $359 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAHL HOME FOR THE AGED AND INFIRM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAV Life: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL COMMUNITY CIRCLE FOOD PANTR: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETTENDORF COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILESTONES AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC: $87 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT WINDS FREEDOM BAND: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Vander Veer Inc: $40 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER BEND TRANSIT: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of the Quad Cities ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAFE ON VINE ↗
  • Who funds QUAD CITIES LIFE SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Palm Springs ↗
  • Who funds QUAD CITY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Quad Cities Community…Scott County Regional…Quad Cities Golf Clas…The Vonderhaar Family…United Way Quad CitiesCharles R and Nancy L…Modern Woodmen of Ame…Marie H Bechtel Chari…Hubbell-Waterman FndnAmerican Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…
Quad Cities Community FoundationIA27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Quad Cities Community Foundation · Scott County Regional Authority · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · The Vonderhaar Family Foundation · United Way Quad Cities · Charles R and Nancy L Von Maur Charitable Foundation · Modern Woodmen of America · Marie H Bechtel Charitable Trust · Hubbell-Waterman Fndn · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weigle Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weigle Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Weigle Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Weigle Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weigle Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home