· Public charity
Modern Woodmen of America
To improve the quality of life for our members
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $662,833 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,465,779 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $802,946 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $289k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $332k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRINITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $102,110 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $74,840 |
| ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY | $55,000 |
| VERA FRENCH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER | $50,000 |
| NIABI ZOO FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES | $43,333 |
| QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP MANOR | $34,000 |
| CHRISTIAN FRIENDLINESS ASSOCIATION - YOUTHHOPE | $31,665 |
| RIVER BEND FOOD BANK | $28,155 |
| BALLET QUAD CITIES | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR ACTIVE SENIORS INC | $18,280 |
| GILDA'S CLUB OF QUAD CITIES | $17,165 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY QC | $14,665 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $12,895 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $583k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
38 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YOYWCA OF THE QUAD CITIES6× · 2018–2023 · $256k · revenue +267%
- TRTwo Rivers YMCA Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $237k · revenue +65%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches8× · 2017–2024 · $227k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- PCPALMER COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +17%
- WIWestern Illinois University Foundationone grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +17%
- NCNAMI COLORADOone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The quad cities chamber of commerce is a combined chamber of commerce, economic, and community development organization serving the greater quad cities region. the quad cities chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen and enhance the…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
The Dubuque Area Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) will lead tourism destination promotion and development to enhance and expand the Dubuque Area experience.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Provide high quality living and services to enable lower income older adult residents of the managed apartment buildings to flourish independently; and create inspiring programming to enable both residents and community seniors to maintain…
It is the mission of sinnissippi centers, inc. to provide quality, coordinated and responsive behavioral healthcare services to individuals, families and the communities we serve.
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quad Cities Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is New Ground Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 54. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 11% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YWCA OF THE QUAD CITIES ↗
- Who funds Two Rivers YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds YOUTHHOPE ↗
- Who funds ST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY IOWA & NW ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - QUAD CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDLY HOUSE OF DAVENPORT IOWA ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM MUSEUM AND SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BALLET QUAD CITIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Active Seniors Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S THERAPY CENTER OF THE QUAD CITIES NFP ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITIES REGIONAL VISION ↗
- Who funds Vera French Community Mental Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITY BOTANICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NIABI ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF ROCK ISLAND ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE IOWA MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds THE MIDWEST WRITING CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds QUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND ↗
- Who funds NEW GROUND THEATRE ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERING ABILITIES ↗
- Who funds LL Global Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scott County Regional Authority · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Community Foundation · Moline Foundation · United Way Quad Cities · Hubbell-Waterman Fndn · Doris & Victor Day Foundation Inc · Rauch Family Foundation I Inc · The Rock Island Community Foundation · Grant & Virginia Brissman Foundation Nfp · Roy J Carver Charitable Trust · Mary Iva Gittins Knouse Tr Uw
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Modern Woodmen of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Modern Woodmen of America?
Find your warmest path to Modern Woodmen of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.