· Private foundation
The Waterfield Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k49 grants · $132k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $231k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLEAR LAKE TWP LAND CONSERVANCY | $166,407 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $65,000 |
| SUNDANCE INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| COM FDN OF GREATER FORT WAYNE | $10,000 |
| BRIDGE OF GRACE | $9,750 |
| TURNSTONE CTR FOR CHILDREN A & ADULT | $5,000 |
| BLUE JACKET INC | $5,000 |
| LITERARY ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| CASS HOUSING INC | $5,000 |
| ROLLING INTO ROANOKE INC | $5,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| AMANI FAMILY SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WELLSPRING INTERFAITH SOCIAL AGENCY | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER FW | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Northwestern University5× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +33%- CLCLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY INC3× · 2020–2024 · $216k · revenue +203%
Sundance Institute4× · 2021–2024 · $95k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- CSCANTERBURY SCHOOL INCone grant, 2023 · $31k · revenue -43%
- CSCANTERBURY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +67%
- V(VISITINGNURSE&HOSPICEHOMEINC (dba - FAMILY LIFECARE)one grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pbs fort wayne engages our community through content and collaborations that educate, inform, inspire, and entertain.
New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.
Provide services in response to individual need
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.
The mission of insource is to provide parents, families, individuals and service providers in the state of indiana the information and training necessary to help assure effective educational programs and appropriate services for…
The indianapolis private industry council, inc., doing business as employindy, the workforce investment board for marion county, is a not-for-profit corporation responsible for the development of the marion county workforce. employindy…
The northeast indiana regional partnership, inc. (partnership) mission is to drive business investment and strengthen northeast indiana's global competitiveness and economic resilency. through its combined efforts the partnership supports…
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.
Greater fort wayne (gfw) inc. is the chamber of commerce and economic development organization for fort wayne & allen county, indiana. at gfw inc., we focus on supporting local business, attracting new business, and improving our…
Mission is to provide necessary resources to persons with disabilities in order to assist them in enhancing their daily lives. we provide pre-vocational training, habilitation services, individual support, and employment services based on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turnstone Center for Children & Adults With Disabilities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pufferbelly Junction Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds CLEAR LAKE TOWNSHIP LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
- Who funds BLUE JACKET INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OF GRACE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRIES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PUFFERBELLY JUNCTION INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds ROLLING INTO ROANOKE INC ↗
- Who funds PFW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORT WAYNE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CASS HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORLINK FORT WAYNE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Super Shot Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THIRTEEN STEP HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE INC ↗
- Who funds AMANI FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VINCENT VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA ↗
- Who funds CHILL INC ↗
- Who funds Homebound Meals Inc ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE CENTRAL INC ↗
- Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE FOR THE BLIND AND DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds EUELL A WILSON CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Edward M Wilson Foundation · M E Raker Foundation Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · The James Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · McMillen Foundation Inc · Flora Dale Krouse Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Surack Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Waterfield Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Waterfield Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Waterfield Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.