Skip to content

· Private foundation

Washington Square Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$700kHuman Services$380kHousing & Shelter$275kEducation$175k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC$25,000
GLOBAL KIDS INC$25,000
PUBLICOLOR INC$25,000
GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY$25,000
RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC$25,000
VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB QUEENS$25,000
HARLEM ACADEMY$25,000
GIRLS INC OF NYC$25,000
GIRLS INC OF NYC$25,000
NEW SETTLEMENT APARTMENTS$25,000
SEARCH & CARE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $555k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $25k → 20%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $25k → 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $25k → 20%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $25k → 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $25k → 20%FORESTDALE: $25k → 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $25k → 20%FORESTDALE INC: $25k → 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $25k → 20%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $25k → 13%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $25k → 20%FORESTDALE INC: $25k → 13%QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $25k → 13%FORESTDALE: $25k → 13%SEARCH & CARE INC: $25k → 17%SEARCH & CARE INC: $25k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $25k → 17%SEARCH & CARE INC: $25k → 17%SEARCH & CARE: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT: $20k → 17%UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of Washington Square Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 61%.

Washington Square Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$1.5M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+27%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +111%
  • GK
    GLOBAL KIDS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +76%
  • QC
    QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • VB
    VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • LO
    LATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
School in the Square Public Charter School

School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…

Education
2
Harlem Children's Zone Inc

We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.

Human Services
3
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
4
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
5
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
6
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
7
Girls Incorporated of Long Island

The mission of girls incorporated of long island, is to inspire girls to be strong, smart, and bold. the organization provides school and community based programming that serves the unique needs of girls, ages 5-18, living in the nassau…

Education
8
The Urban Assembly Inc

To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.

International
9
Equality Charter School

To ensure each scholar reaches individual academic and personal success through a nurturing scholar-centered approach.

Education
10
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
11
The Lang School

Founded to educate and inspire gifted and precocious learners who require special social, emotional, executive function and academic supports to realize their high potential, in the greater new york city area, for students grades 1 through…

Education
12
Exodus School

The east harlem school challenges students to develop a balanced physical, moral, and intellectual strength that they will use to adapt to change and for the final purpose of creating and sharing lives of deep meaning, dynamic actions, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of New York City; the most unlike its peers is Forestdale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $150,000 · Human ServicesRED HOOK INITIATIVEQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $125,000 · Human ServicesQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSESEARCH AND CARE INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesSEARCH AND CARE INCFORESTDALE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesFORESTDALE INCDay One of New York Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesDay One of New York IncUNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesUNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INCGLOBAL KIDS INC: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentGLOBAL KIDS INCVARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF QUEENS INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentVARIETY BOYS AND GIR…LATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATINAS ON THE VERGE…GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $125,000 · EducationGEORGE JACKSON ACADE…PUBLICOLOR INC: $100,000 · EducationPUBLICOLOR INCHARLEM ACADEMY: $50,000 · EducationHARLEM ACADEMYNEW SETTLEMENT APARTMENTS: $150,000 · OtherNEW SETTLEME…VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $25,000 · OtherVARIETY BOYS…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $150,000 · Civil RightsGIRLS INCOR…
Human Services$655,000Youth Development$275,000Education$275,000Other$175,000Civil Rights$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRED HOOK INITIATIVE: $150,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $150,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL KIDS INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $125,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC: $120,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPUBLICOLOR INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFORESTDALE INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDay One of New York Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF QUEENS INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetUNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLICOLOR INC ↗
  • Who funds FORESTDALE INC ↗
  • Who funds Day One of New York Inc ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF QUEENS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Amazin' Mets Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington Square Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington Square Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Washington Square’s filings →

    More from the funding graph