Skip to content
Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences at a glance

· Public charity

Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences

The primary mission of the Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences is to promote the establishment, successful management and growth of high quality community based recovery residences in Washington State.

$6.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
64
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$476k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$5.5MHuman Services$1.3MHealth$788kReligion$660kCommunity Improvement$214kCrime & Legal$158kPhilanthropy$149kArts & Culture$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $291k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $4.4M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.3M
$84,850
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Trinity Transitional Housing$476,459
Elijah Family Homes$473,418
Remnant Army Northwest$417,773
Olive Branch Culture$360,685
Shelton Housing First LLC$299,662
JT's Place$261,496
WHO Wheeler Housing$232,286
Eagle's Wings Coordinated Care$230,106
Yakima Valley Recovery$224,314
Value Based Solution$214,450
OUR Passion$189,762
ODAT Hand Up Housing LLC$163,480
Seasons Housing$155,366
Crux Care Co-Living LLC$151,827
LTZ Capital Kennedy's Place$151,444
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hope Street: $13k → 13%Hope Street: $11k → 13%Reclaim Project Recovery: $6k → 12%Reclaim Project Recovery: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 37 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
3

Total granted

$7.3M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-5%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Housing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOFF FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $129k · revenue +9% · 26% of their budget
  • NE
    New Earth Recovery
    2× · 2024–2025 · $97k · revenue +46%
  • TM
    TRULY MOTIVATED TRANSITIONAL LIVING
    2× · 2024–2025 · $36k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • RR
    Rahma Recovery Center
    one grant, 2024 · $61k
  • AH
    Alpha House LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CW
    Caring with Compassion Community
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
2
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
3
Pro-Hope Inc

Sober living and community residential services

—
4
Crossroads Recovery House
—
5
River Bend Recovery

A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.

Health
6
Hope Ridge Recovery Inc

Provide safe haven for recovering women

Health
7
In His Loving Embrace Inc

Provide second change housing for homeless.

Human Services
8
Mikes Place a non-profit recovery house
Health
9
Marys House of Restoration

Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment

—
10
Willing 2 Move Forward

Willing 2 Move Forward is a transitional, clean, safe and mutually supportive living environment for men and women who are committed to achieving and maintaining a positive lifestyle. Our purpose is to provide a transitional bridge to aid…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Affinity House

Sober living for women

Health
12
Arise Recovery Residences Inc

Our mission is to provide a safe and structured environment where alcoholics and addicts can develop the skills and tools necessary to achieve long term recovery. We believe that anyone can live their life without the use of alcohol and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kennedys Place; the most unlike its peers is New Life Recovery Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
7/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Remnant Army Northwest: $496,610 · OtherRemnant Army NorthwestSHF: $311,512 · OtherSHFODAT Hand Up Housing LLC: $299,197 · OtherODAT Hand Up Housing LLCJTS PLACE: $298,050 · OtherJTS PLACEYakima Valley Recovery: $245,200 · OtherValue Based Solution: $214,450 · OtherTop Notch Homes: $201,950 · OtherVictory Outreach Church of Tri Cities: $186,999 · OtherKITSAP COUNTY DRUG COURT ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $173,249 · OtherFOSTERING EXCELLENCE IN SOMEONE FOUNDATION: $164,850 · OtherVISION CHURCH: $161,418 · Other+30 more: $1,975,386 · Other+30 moreTRINITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING: $675,805 · Housing & ShelterTRINITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSINGELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $485,135 · Housing & ShelterELIJAH FAMILY HOMESOlive Branch Culture: $444,347 · Housing & ShelterOlive Branch CultureEAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE: $390,271 · Housing & ShelterEAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CAREWHO-WHEELER HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $351,494 · Housing & ShelterWHO-WHEELER HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATIO…Seasons Housing: $337,945 · Housing & ShelterSeasons HousingO U R PASSION: $329,882 · Housing & ShelterO U R PASSIONHelmsman House Foundation: $167,915 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $117,677 · Housing & ShelterAbsolute Ministries: $206,994 · HealthAbsolute …KENNEDYS PLACE: $151,444 · HealthKENNEDYS …HOPE HEALS NW: $147,753 · HealthHOPE HEAL…New Earth Recovery: $97,074 · HealthNew Earth…WASHINGTON MONITORING BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $77,427 · HealthWASHINGTO…+4 more: $65,250 · Health+4 moreTHE HOFF FOUNDATION: $128,925 · Human ServicesHOPE STREET: $23,100 · Human ServicesReclaim Project Recovery: $11,200 · Human ServicesKATE'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $144,263 · Crime & LegalTRULY MOTIVATED TRANSITIONAL LIVING: $36,003 · International
Other$4,728,871Housing & Shelter$3,300,471Health$745,942Human Services$163,225Crime & Legal$144,263International$36,003

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING: $675,805 over 2y, 36% of budgetELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $485,135 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOlive Branch Culture: $444,347 over 2y, 29% of budgetEAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE: $390,271 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWHO-WHEELER HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION: $351,494 over 2y, 58% of budgetSeasons Housing: $337,945 over 2y, 76% of budgetO U R PASSION: $329,882 over 2y, 20% of budgetAbsolute Ministries: $206,994 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetHelmsman House Foundation: $167,915 over 2y, 21% of budgetHOPE HEALS NW: $147,753 over 2y, 66% of budgetKATE'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $144,263 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetTHE HOFF FOUNDATION: $128,925 over 2y, 26% of budgetNew Earth Recovery: $97,074 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWASHINGTON MONITORING BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $77,427 over 2y, 53% of budgetTRULY MOTIVATED TRANSITIONAL LIVING: $36,003 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWEST SOUND TREATMENT CENTER: $24,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNew Life Recovery Services: $23,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE STREET: $23,100 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetAGAPE UNLIMITED: $12,944 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetReclaim Project Recovery: $11,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCaring with Compassion Community: $9,150 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLIFELINE CONNECTIONS: $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds ELIJAH FAMILY HOMES ↗
  • Who funds Olive Branch Culture ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES WINGS COORDINATED CARE ↗
  • Who funds WHO-WHEELER HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Seasons Housing ↗
  • Who funds O U R PASSION ↗
  • Who funds Absolute Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Helmsman House Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KENNEDYS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HEALS NW ↗
  • Who funds KATE'S HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOFF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KITSAP HOMES OF COMPASSION ↗
  • Who funds New Earth Recovery ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON MONITORING BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Network for GoodDC2.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences?

    Find your warmest path to Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Washington Alliance for Quality Recovery Residences’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home