How much did Warrior Assist Foundation grant in FY2025?

Warrior Assist Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $42,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is Warrior Assist Foundation based?

Warrior Assist Foundation is based in DE.

Warrior Assist Foundation

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

Warrior Assist Foundation

This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.

$43k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$8k

Largest

01What you fund

01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.

Public Benefit$64kPhilanthropy$31kHuman Services$15kHealth$8kCrime & Legal$5kEnvironment$5k

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

OUR MILITARY KIDS INC$7,500
WORKING DOGS FOR VETS$5,000
FREEDOM RIVER INC$5,000
NEXTOP INC$5,000
UNITED THROUGH READING$5,000
STILLWATER RANCH INC$5,000
VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT$5,000
STOP SOLDIER SUICIDE$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Warrior Assist Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Warrior Assist Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$72k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$72k

$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%

+143%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Public BenefitPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UT
UNITED THROUGH READING
4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +178%
VR
VETS RETURNING HOME INC
2× · 2021–2023 · $14k · revenue +1%
VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT
3× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +741%

Funded once

PF
PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICAgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +143%
AO
ANGELS OF AMERICAS FALLENgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +259%
BS
BLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS INCgraduated
one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

America's Vetdogs

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for veterans…

Public Benefit

Usvets - Arizona

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Housing & Shelter

Veterans Recovery Resources

Provide therapy and treatment options for veterans in crisis, including, among other things, in-patient residential and out-patient treatment, and to establish a mechanism for counseling and fellowship among service members and veterans…

Public Benefit

K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research & advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

—

Battle Buddy Response Team Inc

Prevention of veteran suicide by serving veterans and their families.

Health

Leashes of Valor

Leashes of valor is a national nonprofit that provides highly-trained service dogs to post-9/11 veterans to help with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) or military sexual trauma (mst), an…

Public Benefit

Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit

Veterans Collaborative

Veterans Collaborative serves active-duty military service members Veterans and their families.

Public Benefit

Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services

Amvets (American Veterans)

Provide support for vets/ military that enhance the quality of life for citizens/vets alike.

—

Healing Paws for Warriors Inc

Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…

Human Services

United States War Dogs

To support military working dog teams who are deployed through operation military care k9. assist in the adoption and placement of retired military dogs. assist in the procuring of rescued dogs to train with soldiers who are dealing with…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tragedy Assistance Program for and the most unlike its peers is Vets Returning Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

16/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Public Benefit$63,500Philanthropy$31,000Human Services$15,000Health$7,500Crime & Legal$5,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Others First IncMI13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Others First Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Warrior Assist Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: STILLWATER RANCH INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +88% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 810824919 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on STILLWATER RANCH INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Warrior Assist Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Warrior Assist Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Warrior Assist Foundation

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Warrior Assist Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Warrior Assist Foundation

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Warrior Assist Foundation?

More from the funding graph