Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Warren and Zoann Little Dusenbury Charity Trust

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10M
Granted FY2020
26
Grants FY2020
8
States reached
$7.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of WARREN AND ZOANN LITTLE DUSENBURY CHARITY TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2020 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $280k
  • $250k+4 grants · $10M
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUSENBURY FAMILY CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND$7,918,373
THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION$1,429,000
HAWKEN SCHOOL$370,000
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$335,000
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR$25,000
BOOK TRUST$25,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$20,000
PROJECT SELF SUFFICIENCY$20,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND$20,000
SMITH COLLEGE$20,000
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$20,000
CROSSROADS SAFE HOUSE$20,000
OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND ALLIANCE$15,000
CONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK$15,000
COLORADO OPEN LANDS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 26 repeat orgs$8.0M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
3

Total granted

$2.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+206%

Still filing today

77%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HAWKEN SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $616k · revenue +76%
  • WR
    WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $519k · revenue +53%
  • BT
    BOOK TRUST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer Countygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • EN
    EMERALD NECKLACE ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CF
    COALITION FOR THE POUDRE RIVER WATERSHEDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +206%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
The Clearwater Conservancy of Central Pennsylvania Inc

To conserve and restore the natural resources through land conservation, water resources stewardship and environmental outreach across central pennsylvania.

Environment
4
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Claremont Lincoln University

Delivers affordable, accessible, and relevant higher education programs.

Education
7
New York League of Conservation Voters

See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…

8
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
9
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
10
Federation of State Conservation Voter Leagues Dba Nj League of Cons Voters

New jersey lcv is the statewide political voice for the environment. working with our allies in the community, we advocate for strong environmental policies, support our environmental justice partners in pursuing more equitable policies,…

11
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bas Bleu Theater Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Government Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Community Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Elementary Literacy TutoringIndependent K-8 SchoolsLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr13%66%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,950

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUSENBURY FAMILY CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $7,918,373 · OtherDUSENBURY FAMILY CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND+15 more — $305,000 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $1,429,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND …THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $60,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $8,000 · PhilanthropyHAWKEN SCHOOL — $616,000 · EducationBOOK TRUST — $100,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $82,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $30,000 · EducationWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $519,000 · EnvironmentTHE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $80,000 · EnvironmentLIVING LANDS & WATERS — $60,000 · EnvironmentSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES — $40,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO OPEN LANDS — $31,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK — $30,000 · Environment+2 more — $25,000 · EnvironmentPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $80,000 · ReligionBas Bleu Theater Company — $40,000 · Arts & CultureOpenStage Theatre and Co Inc — $30,000 · Arts & CultureNEVADA CITY COMMUNITY BROADCAST GROUP — $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$8,223,373Philanthropy$1,497,000Education$878,000Environment$785,000Religion$80,000Arts & Culture$80,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $1,429,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHAWKEN SCHOOL — $616,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $519,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBOOK TRUST — $100,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $82,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $80,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $80,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING LANDS & WATERS — $60,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBas Bleu Theater Company — $40,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES — $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN LANDS — $31,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOpenStage Theatre and Co Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK — $22,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND KIDS' BOOK BANK — $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetVERDE VALLEY SCHOOL — $14,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTERLA FAMILIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEVADA CITY COMMUNITY BROADCAST GROUP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLAUREL SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE POUDRE RIVER WATERSHED — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATIONCO23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · The Cleveland Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Colorado Gives Foundation · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust · The George Gund Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Food Bank for Larimer County · The Louise H & David S Ingalls Fdn · United Way of Larimer County · Anschutz Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Warren and Zoann Little Dusenbury Charity Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Warren and Zoann Little Dusenbury Charity Trust?

Find your warmest path to Warren and Zoann Little Dusenbury Charity Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph