Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter & Mary a Stastny Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$396kCommunity Improvement$45kHealth$14kArts & Culture$13kHuman Services$13kAnimals$8kScience & Tech$4kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $61k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$821k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$49,610
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$11,750
CHICO STATE UNIVERSITY$9,000
OHSU$6,500
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$4,000
YMCA$4,000
KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,500
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS$3,000
GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY$2,875
OIT$2,750
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$2,000
SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$1,750
FRESNO STATE UNIVERSITY$1,500
TMS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIV: $4k → 12%CHICO STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%MALIN PARK: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $5k → 8%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 12%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%MALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB: $19k → 16%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%MALIN PARK: $12k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $10k → 15%MALIN PARK: $12k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%OHSU: $7k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $5k → 15%MALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB: $11k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 18%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 18%OHSU: $6k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $4k → 15%MALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB: $8k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%MALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB: $7k → 16%MALIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 16%YMCA: $5k → 16%KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 16%YMCA: $4k → 16%KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 16%OIT: $25k → 16%OIT: $19k → 16%OIT: $9k → 16%OIT: $7k → 16%OIT: $7k → 16%OIT: $6k → 16%OIT: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
NV
WY
IN
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
AZ
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$621k · 54 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
36

Total granted

$621k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+10%

Still filing today

22%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +36%
  • WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +32%
  • WC
    WESTMONT COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • PM
    PAUL MITCHELL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • UT
    UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • OC
    OREGON COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
2
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
3
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
7
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
8
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
11
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Pacific; the most unlike its peers is Malin Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OIT: $81,038 · OtherOITIndividual grant recipient: $73,732 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $63,825 · OtherCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association IncorporatedOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $55,190 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYMALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB: $44,500 · OtherMALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUBUNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $29,225 · OtherKLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $21,845 · Other+73 more: $229,479 · Other+73 moreGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $14,125 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $12,375 · EducationSMART READING: $6,300 · EducationWESTMONT COLLEGE: $4,750 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4,125 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $2,025 · Education+8 more: $5,125 · EducationMALIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11,000 · Arts & CultureROSS RAGLAND THEATER AND CULTURAL C: $550 · Arts & CultureORE CAL LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,555 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF PETS OF KLAMATH BASIN INC: $1,500 · AnimalsTiny Mighty and Strong Corporation: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA FOR CHILDREN OF KLAMATH COUNTY: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$598,834Education$52,325Arts & Culture$11,550Recreation & Sports$1,555Animals$1,500Youth Development$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $63,825 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetMALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB: $44,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $14,125 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $12,375 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMALIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $11,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetSMART READING: $6,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $2,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORE CAL LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,555 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PETS OF KLAMATH BASIN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of the Pacific: $1,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTiny Mighty and Strong Corporation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA FOR CHILDREN OF KLAMATH COUNTY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST COLLEGE OF ART: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSS RAGLAND THEATER AND CULTURAL C: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds MALIN COMMUNITY SERVICE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MALIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SMART READING ↗
  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley · West Scholarship Fnd · Eminger Stewart Foundation Uma · Jefferson Scholarship Fund · Leo Adler Trust · Al & Ib Thomas Ed'L Fd · Wayne C Stewart Foundation Uma · The Renaissance Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter & Mary a Stastny Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter & Mary a Stastny Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University: 5% of income from government
  • Smart Reading: 4% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 4% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • Corban University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 3% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter & Mary a Stastny’s filings →

More from the funding graph