Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter & Frances Green Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$299kArts & Culture$59kYouth Development$34kHuman Services$22kRecreation & Sports$21kInternational$8kScience & Tech$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,050
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY$4,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEAD-DEADWOOD$3,500
SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$3,000
LDMS - OUTLAW RANCH PROGRAM$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF JAMESTOWN$3,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,300
THE PAUL MITCHELL SCHOOL$2,000
SOUTHEAST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$2,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $775 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MN
IL
WY
SD
IA
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 42 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
37

Total granted

$394k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+8%

Still filing today

19%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BLACK HILLS MINING MUSEUM
    5× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +66%
  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +49%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
    6× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN DAKOTA
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -9%
  • L
    LDMS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
4
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
8
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
9
Johnson University

Johnson university is a private, coeducational institution of higher learning offering associate, bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees.

Education
10
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
11
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
12
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dakota Wesleyan University; the most unlike its peers is Black Hills Mining Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $39,750 · OtherBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $37,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEAD-DEADWOOD: $30,200 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEAD-DEADWOODSD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY: $18,000 · OtherLDMS - OUTLAW RANCH PROGRAM: $17,500 · OtherLEAD-DEADWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $17,350 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: $16,500 · OtherBLACK HILLS MINING MUSEUM: $15,784 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $15,500 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherLEAD-DEADWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL: $14,560 · Other+64 more: $161,206 · Other+64 moreAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $14,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $5,000 · EducationDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4,250 · EducationAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationUniversity of Jamestown: $3,000 · EducationMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $1,500 · EducationHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY: $15,725 · Arts & CultureDEADWOOD HISTORY INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $10,175 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $7,800 · InternationalNORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM: $3,000 · Civil RightsLORDS CUPBOARD: $2,500 · Food & NutritionLAWRENCE COUNTY COALITION: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$398,350Education$33,750Arts & Culture$21,225Human Services$10,175International$7,800Civil Rights$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,500Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK HILLS MINING MUSEUM: $15,784 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetHISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY: $15,725 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $10,175 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $7,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDEADWOOD HISTORY INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Jamestown: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM: $3,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY COALITION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLEAD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK HILLS MINING MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC HOMESTAKE OPERA HOUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds DEADWOOD HISTORY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
  • Who funds DAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Jamestown ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN HILLS AREA CASA PROGRAM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · James E & Lillian E Shea Charitable Trust · The Leonard Rydell Foundation · La Amundson Ohana Foundation · Adams Mastrovich Fam Fdn · Black Hills Area Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter & Frances Green Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter & Frances Green Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Walter & Frances Green Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Walter & Frances Green Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter & Frances Green’s filings →

    More from the funding graph