Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter and Fannie Wang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2019
14
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Walter and Fannie Wang Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to University Of Southern California, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Walter and Fannie Wang Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $15k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
6
’18
6
’19
6
’20
4
’21
5
’22
5
’23
4
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$129kReligion$26kInternational$11kHealth$10kYouth Development$8kPhilanthropy$6kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$387k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN JOSE CHINESE CATHOLIC MISSION$2,600
DORIS DILLON IN CAMBODIA$2,500
SAN JOSE CHINESE SCHOOL$2,100
QUICKSILVER SWIMMING$1,300
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$1,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$1,000
KHAN ACADEMY$1,000
BRET HARTE COMMUNITY CLUB$1,000
THE TECH INTERACTIVE$500
CHINESE AMERICAN MARRIAGE ENCOUNTER$500
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$500
BOYS TOWN$500
WILLIAMS WINS FOUNDATION$350
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%HANDS OF LOVE USA: $5k → 8%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%HANDS OF LOVE USA: $3k → 8%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
CA
NE
VA
AZ
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 21 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2019, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$96k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+33%

Still filing today

48%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KHAN ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $5k · revenue +154%
  • SJ
    SAN JOSE CHINESE SCHOOL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • BH
    BRET HARTE EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +285%

Funded once

  • FA
    FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • TE
    THE EXPLORATORIUM
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
6
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
7
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
8
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
11
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
12
Marshall B Ketchum University

To educate caring, inspired health care professionals who are prepared to deliver collaborative, patient-centric health care in an interprofessional environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Exploratorium; the most unlike its peers is Quicksilver Swimming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $81,080 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIATHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSIT…EX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $6,150 · EducationEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UTKHAN ACADEMY INC: $5,131 · EducationBRET HARTE EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION: $4,562 · Education+3 more: $3,164 · EducationSAN JOSE CHINESE CATHOLIC MISSION: $19,957 · OtherSAN JOSE CHINESE CATHOLIC MISSIONLELAND HIGH SCHOOL: $6,052 · OtherLELAND HIGH SCHOOLWILLIAMS WINS FOUNDATION: $6,051 · OtherWILLIAMS WINS FOUNDATIONLELAND BRIDGE PARENT CLUB: $5,258 · OtherLELAND BRIDGE PARENT CLUBALMADEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherALMADEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHURCHASIAN AMERICAN FOR COMMUNITY INVOLV: $3,885 · OtherASIAN AMERICAN FOR COMMUNITY INVO…DORIS DILLON IN CAMBODIA: $3,020 · OtherBRET HARTE COMMUNITY CLUB: $2,520 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherHOLY FAMILY: $2,200 · Other+18 more: $7,742 · Other+18 moreLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthHANDS OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,500 · Human ServicesSAN JOSE CHINESE SCHOOL: $4,900 · Arts & CultureTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $1,545 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $329 · Arts & CultureQUICKSILVER SWIMMING: $2,920 · Recreation & SportsFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Education$115,087Other$63,185Health$10,100Human Services$9,500Arts & Culture$7,774Recreation & Sports$2,920Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $81,080 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $6,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $5,131 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRET HARTE EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION: $4,562 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetQUICKSILVER SWIMMING: $2,920 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLELAND HIGH SCHOOL PARENT CLUB: $2,542 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $1,545 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDON CALLEJON SCHOOL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $570 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $461 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $329 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Clara Schools Foundation: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT ↗
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE CHINESE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BRET HARTE EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds QUICKSILVER SWIMMING ↗
  • Who funds LELAND HIGH SCHOOL PARENT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TECH INTERACTIVE ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DON CALLEJON SCHOOL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kla FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kla Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter and Fannie Wang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter and Fannie Wang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter and Fannie Wang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph