Skip to content
Walske Charitable Foundation Steven C Walske Et Al Trustees at a glance

· Private foundation

Walske Charitable Foundation Steven C Walske Et Al Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$375k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.2MEducation$683kHealth$215kPhilanthropy$201kRecreation & Sports$58kReligion$55kInternational$30kCommunity Improvement$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET$110,000
THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY$75,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$50,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$25,000
FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SF DEYOUNG MUSEUM$15,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$15,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA GUILD$10,000
UCSF BENIOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS-CHILDREN'S FUND$10,000
CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
BEVERLY HILLS PRESYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
PRINCETON PROSPECT FOUNDATION$10,000
BRIDGES IMPACT FOUNDATION$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
BOSTON 2026 WORLD STAMP SHOW$5,000
PHILATELIC FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SANERGY INC: $20k → 7%BOSTON 2026 WORLD STAMP SHOW: $10k → 8%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%MARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%BATES COLLEGE: $20k → 13%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%MARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $90k → 14%BRIDGES IMPACT FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SF DEYOUNG MUSEUM: $25k → 10%HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $40k → 14%BRIDGES IMPACT FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $40k → 14%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $23k → 10%FINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SF DEYOUNG MUSEUM: $15k → 10%HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $15k → 14%UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY: $75k → 14%THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY: $72k → 14%THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY: $50k → 14%THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY: $50k → 14%THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY: $50k → 14%UCSF FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $110k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $100k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $100k → 10%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $35k → 14%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $100k → 10%BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT: $25k → 16%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $50k → 10%THE WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $25k → 14%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $50k → 10%BRIDGES IMPACT FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%SAN FRANCISCO HOST COMMITTEE: $30k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO BALLET: $15k → 10%HAMLIN SCHOOL: $155k → 10%HAMMER MUSEUM: $50k → 14%HAMLIN SCHOOL: $70k → 10%HAMLIN SCHOOL: $25k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: $25k → 10%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 14%LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $15k → 14%THE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%NET IMPACT: $25k → 10%NET IMPACT: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 28 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+31%

Still filing today

61%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyInternationalHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $525k · revenue +37%
  • TH
    THE HAMLIN SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2023 · $263k · revenue +18%
  • HS
    HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $185k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • AH
    ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -6%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO HOST COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +120%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
8
Berggruen Institute
Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridges Impact Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The David Hockney Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTY: $301,600 · OtherTHE MUSIC CENTER OF LA COUNTYTHE HAMLIN SCHOOL: $263,000 · OtherTHE HAMLIN SCHOOLUC BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $172,500 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONFINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SF DEYOUNG MUSEUM: $60,000 · OtherFINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SF DEYOUNG MUSEUMNET IMPACT: $46,100 · Other+13 more: $254,800 · Other+13 moreSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $525,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATIONARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND …CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $35,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON BALLET INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $35,000 · Arts & CultureISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $185,000 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHO…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…Vanderbilt University: $50,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityUCLA FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONWOMEN FOUNDERS NETWORK: $30,000 · EducationWOMEN FOUNDERS NETWOR…The Trustees of Princeton University: $25,000 · EducationTHE MAX WARBURG COURAGE CURRICULUM INC: $20,000 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $20,000 · EducationBRIDGES IMPACT FOUNDATION: $135,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyMARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION: $57,500 · Community ImprovementCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 · HealthSANERGY INC: $20,000 · InternationalLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $2,500 · Religion
Other$1,098,000Arts & Culture$760,000Education$495,000Philanthropy$167,500Community Improvement$57,500Health$50,000International$20,000Religion$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $525,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HAMLIN SCHOOL: $263,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $185,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGES IMPACT FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIS CAMP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DBA MARTIS CAMP FOUNDATION: $57,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNET IMPACT: $46,100 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON BALLET INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN FOUNDERS NETWORK: $30,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetISABELLA STEWART GARDNER MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO HOST COMMITTEE: $30,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAX WARBURG COURAGE CURRICULUM INC: $20,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA GUILD AT THE WAR MEMORIAL OPERA HOUSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BATTERY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOSTON 2026 WORLD STAMP SHOW INC: $15,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON PROSPECT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROOM TO READ: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILATELIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DAVID HOCKNEY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The San Francisco Fou…ImpactassetsincGs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walske Charitable Foundation Steven C Walske Et Al Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walske Charitable Foundation Steven C Walske Et Al Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Boston Ballet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walske Charitable Foundation Steven C Walske Et Al Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home