Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Waking Up Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$705k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$300,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 9
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$1.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Waking Up Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
HealthEducationScience & TechHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$705k60%
FY20238$1.3M100%
FY20229$1.7M78%
FY20216$750kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.2MScience & Tech$1.1MInternational$1.1MHealth$375kSocial Science$250kHuman Services$230kPhilanthropy$215kFood & Nutrition$150kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.6M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Waking Up Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEffective Ventures Foundation USA Inc: $656,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSafe Artificial Intelligence Forum Institute: $300,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSecurebio Inc: $270,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGivedirectly Inc: $230,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease Research Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $180,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Good Food Institute Inc: $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHorizon Institute for Public Service: $74,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSightsavers Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREAT Humanity formerly Be Herd Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetClean Air Task Force Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMalaria Consortium US Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDongyu Gatsal Ling Initiatives Incorporated: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Good Ventures FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Good Ventures Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Waking Up Foundation with peer funders

About Waking Up Foundation

How much does Waking Up Foundation give?
Waking Up Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $704,700 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 9 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Waking Up Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (26%), Science & Tech (23%), International (23%).
Who are Waking Up Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc ($656k), Safe Artificial Intelligence Forum Institute ($300k), Securebio Inc ($270k).
Does Waking Up Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Waking Up Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Waking Up Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Good Ventures Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Waking Up Foundation based?
Waking Up Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Waking Up’s filings →

More from the funding graph