· Private foundation
Waimakua Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN | $30,000 |
| KAUAI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION LTD | $22,000 |
| NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN | $20,000 |
| ISLAND SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| KAUAI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION LTD | $10,000 |
| HUI O LAKA | $5,000 |
| KAUAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| YWCA | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| SAINT MICHAEL'S AND ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $2,000 |
| KAUAI INDEPENDANT FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| GARDEN ISLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| HAW'N MISSION CHILDREN'S SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| HANALEI-WAINIHA-HAENA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NTNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN7× · 2018–2024 · $364k · revenue +158%
- KMKAUAI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION LTD7× · 2018–2024 · $167k · revenue +21%
- ISISLAND SCHOOL7× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- NTNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN - LIMAHULI GARDEN & PRESERVEone grant, 2018 · $30k
- WIWOMAN IN NEED-KAUAIone grant, 2020 · $5k
- GSGIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAIIone grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.
Our Mission is To collect, preserve, and disseminate the oral, written and pictorial history of Kauai County and to educate ourselves and the public about the history and cultures of Kauai and Niihau.
Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.
The mission is to protect and preserve the natural and cultural resources of the hana moku and the customary and traditional practices of native hawaiians of the region; to preserve and manage the area's natural, cultural, scenic, historic…
For the benefit and inspiration of ALL, Na Hoa Aloha o ka Pu'uhonua o Honaunau participates with NPS and other partners to protect and preserve cultural and natural resources, guided by the aacestral knowledge of South Kona.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaiian Mission Children's Society and the most unlike its peers is Malama Kua Aina. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds KAUAI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION LTD ↗
- Who funds ISLAND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HUI O LAKA ↗
- Who funds HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN MISSION CHILDREN'S SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MALAMA HULEIA ↗
- Who funds GARDEN ISLAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds KEKAHU FOUNDATION INC DBA KKCR ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds Hui Maka Ainana O Makana ↗
- Who funds MALAMA KUA AINA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sw Wilcox Trust · Grove Farm Company Foundation · Cooke Foundation Limited · Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · Atherton Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Waimakua Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Waimakua Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Waimakua Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.