Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
97
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$10MCrime & Legal$9.0MHealth$6.0MInternational$3.1MPhilanthropy$2.5MArts & Culture$956kCommunity Improvement$956kCivil Rights$810kOther$0
02FY2024 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $836k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.7M
$25,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU Langone Health$1,110,000
Foundation for the Carolinas$1,000,000
Prep for Prep$500,000
Legal Aid Society$320,500
Harvard Law School$270,500
UJA Federation of New York$260,000
New York City Partnership Foundation Inc$250,000
Children's Aid Society$240,000
University of Chicago Law School$239,500
Columbia Law School$161,000
NYU School of Law$160,000
Equal Justice Works$141,500
Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law$100,000
New York University$75,000
Mobilization for Justice$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $25k → 6%Community Hope Inc: $50k → 5%Community Hope Inc: $50k → 4%Community Hope Inc: $25k → 5%Community Hope Inc: $50k → 4%NARAL Pro Choice America: $25k → 14%Aspira of New York Incorporated: $15k → 17%YMCA of Greater New York: $25k → 17%Hudson Guild: $10k → 17%Sonia and Celina Sotomayor Judicial Internship Pro: $25k → 17%Hudson Guild: $10k → 17%Comprehensive Youth Development: $5k → 17%New York Police & Fire Widows and Children Benefit: $25k → 17%New York Police & Fire Widows and Children Benefit: $25k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $785k → 17%Innocence Project: $50k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $645k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $241k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $240k → 17%Children's Aid Society: $150k → 17%Innocence Project: $50k → 17%Harlem Children's Zone: $50k → 17%Harlem Children's Zone: $25k → 17%Aspira of New York Incorporated: $25k → 17%Aspira of New York Incorporated: $25k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $50k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $25k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $25k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $25k → 17%TEAK Fellowship: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$28M · 101 repeat orgs$6.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

101 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

101
88

Total granted

$28M
$5.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+13%

Still filing today

74%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $570k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +36%
  • PF
    PREP FOR PREP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +22%
  • TL
    THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • NY
    New York University Office of Gift Administration
    one grant, 2020 · $2.2M
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue -4%
  • SF
    SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +125%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Association of American Law Schools Inc

The association of american law schools' mission is to uphold and advance excellence in legal education.

Education
4
New York University School of Law Foundation

The foundation, a subsidiary of new york university, fosters legal education and research at new york university's school of law by awarding scholarships, making grants for educational purposes related to law, and supporting programs of…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
11
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Her Justice Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of the Moving Image. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsMilitary Veterans Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%9%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%63%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/168
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,592

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

161 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 161 of the 222 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
160/161
Grantees still filing
99/161
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NYU Langone Health — $5,220,000 · OtherNYU Langone HealthNew York University School of Law — $2,947,500 · OtherNew York University School of LawNew York University Office of Gift Administration — $2,230,000 · OtherNew York University Office of Gift AdministrationNYU School of Law — $2,210,000 · OtherNYU School of LawColumbia Law School — $1,314,000 · OtherColumbia Law SchoolHarvard Law School — $923,500 · Other+104 more — $5,565,000 · Other+104 morePREP FOR PREP — $2,000,000 · EducationPREP FOR PREPUniversity of Chicago — $641,500 · EducationUniversity of…SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $250,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR …New York University — $225,000 · EducationHER JUSTICE INC — $185,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $175,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $159,500 · EducationMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Education+24 more — $618,000 · Education+24 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $1,214,400 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEW…FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION…New York City Partnership Foundation Inc — $750,000 · PhilanthropyNew York C…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD…+6 more — $147,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $2,060,800 · Human ServicesCommunity Hope Inc — $175,000 · Human ServicesTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $100,000 · Human Services+9 more — $345,000 · Human ServicesTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY — $1,214,800 · Crime & LegalAMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE — $250,000 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $191,500 · Crime & LegalVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $175,000 · Crime & LegalFEDERAL BAR FOUNDATION — $130,000 · Crime & Legal+10 more — $287,500 · Crime & LegalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,000,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $450,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $108,000 · International+5 more — $80,000 · InternationalTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $200,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $100,000 · Arts & CultureNew York Historical Society — $70,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY INC — $61,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $85,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$20,410,000Education$4,404,000Philanthropy$3,361,900Human Services$2,830,800Crime & Legal$2,248,800International$1,638,000Arts & Culture$766,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $2,060,800 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $2,000,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY — $1,214,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $1,214,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York City Partnership Foundation Inc — $750,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $641,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $450,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMobilization for Justice Inc — $300,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE — $250,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNew York University — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $200,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $191,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC — $185,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASPHALT GREEN INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Hope Inc — $175,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $159,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law — $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $140,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetFEDERAL BAR FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC ART FUND INC — $120,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $108,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBET TZEDEK — $86,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc — $85,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTREET LAW INC — $80,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy — $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $68,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRA OF NEW YORK INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds New York City Partnership Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mobilization for Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds HER JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPHALT GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Miami IncQuinn Emanuel Foundat…The Gibson Dunn & Cru…The Sidley Austin Fou…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Weil Gotshal & Manges…The New York Communit…Katten Muchin Rosenma…The Hyde and Watson F…Perkins Coie Foundati…Jewish Communal FundThe Morrison & Foerst…
United Way Miami IncFL56.1× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Miami Inc · Quinn Emanuel Foundation · The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Weil Gotshal & Manges Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Katten Muchin Rosenman Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Perkins Coie Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Community Hope Inc — 41% of income from government
  • Women's Business Development Council Inc — 39% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in — 9% of income from government
  • American Academy of Arts & Sciences — 3% of income from government
  • Easter Seals South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 222 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home