Skip to content
Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association Inc

The wabash county ymca is a charitable nonprofit human service organization that includes children, teens, women and men, and does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, or national origin.

$63k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2019.

Philanthropy$150kEducation$105kRecreation & Sports$51k
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$53,360
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
College Choice Direct$53,360
Community Foundation of Wabash County$9,675
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA CAMP TECUMSEH: $51k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Whitley County Community Foundation Inc

It is the mission of the community foundation of whitley county to inspire philanthropy, enrich community, and serve donors by creating an enduring source of charitable assets.

Philanthropy
2
Adams County Community Foundation Inc

Building partnerships between donors and community to enrich and enhance the quality of life in adams county, indiana.

Philanthropy
3
Our Community Foundation Inc

Meet the changing needs of our community by fostering a culture of local philanthropy and to provide support to public charitable organizations.

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation of Fayette County Pa

To build a stronger fayette county by inspiring charitable giving, supporting nonprofits, and nurturing positive community impact.

Philanthropy
5
Community Foundation of Marquette County

Mission: to enrich the lives of all people in marquette county, by: connecting donors with community needs, building permanent funds for charitable giving, distributing scholarships and grants, and leading and collaborating to address…

Philanthropy
6
Jennings County Community Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to serve philanthropic and charitable needs in jennings county, indiana. the organization offers endowment services, grantmaking, scholarship, donor estate and planned gift services to individuals and…

Philanthropy
7
The Community Foundation of Dickinson County Inc

To connect donors with their charitable giving priorities, serve as a resource for local nonprofit organizations and provide leadership to the community.

Philanthropy
8
Dubois County Community Foundation

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the…

Philanthropy
9
Western Indiana Community Foundation Inc

"helping people improve our community." families, individuals, businesses, and nonprofit groups establish funds within the foundation into which they can contribute a variety of assets to be used for charitable purposes. grants are awarded…

Philanthropy
10
Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas and investment to make this a community where every individual has equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity. (continued on schedule o)

Philanthropy
11
Jefferson Community Foundation

Jcf connects people, ideas, and resources to build a future of opportunity for all in jefferson county.

Philanthropy
12
Community Foundation of Boone County Inc

Our mission is to unite people, organizations and philanthropy to create a thriving community for all.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Indiana Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ymca Camp Tecumseh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

College Choice Direct: $83,035 · OtherCollege Choice DirectJAC CEN DEL SCHOOL CORP: $15,000 · OtherJAC CEN DEL SCHOOL CORPCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $15,000 · OtherCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INCUNITED WAY FOR CLINTON COUNTY INC: $15,000 · OtherUNITED WAY FOR CLINTON COUNTY INCBAUGO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $6,824 · OtherDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $28,719 · PhilanthropyDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $24,649 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNT…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WABASH COUNTY INC: $22,395 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WABASH COUNTY …BLACKFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,850 · PhilanthropyBLACKFORD COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …NORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,450 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION …MARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,317 · PhilanthropyHUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FDTN INC: $5,123 · PhilanthropyBENTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,065 · PhilanthropyYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $51,039 · Human ServicesYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH…PARKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Civil Rights
Other$134,859Philanthropy$104,568Human Services$51,039Civil Rights$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYMCA CAMP TECUMSEH INC: $51,039 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $28,719 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $24,649 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WABASH COUNTY INC: $22,395 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR CLINTON COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPARKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,317 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUNTINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FDTN INC: $5,123 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBENTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,065 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIndependent Colleges …Indiana Philanthropy …Indiana Philanthropy …Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Lilly Endowment IncIN26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Independent Colleges of Indiana Inc · Indiana Philanthropy Alliance Foundation Inc · Indiana Philanthropy Alliance Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wabash County Young Mens Christian Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home