Skip to content

· Private foundation

W Michael & Susan Wells Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$39kEmployment$9kPhilanthropy$4kHousing & Shelter$2kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$1kHuman Services$500
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$168k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREAT AMERICAN SONGBOOK FOUNDATION$5,000
CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$3,750
GOODWILL OF CENTRAL & SOUTHERN INDIANA$2,750
GLEANERS FOOD BANK$2,000
WHEELER MISSION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER: $500 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$51k · 5 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +68% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$51k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+68%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $21k · revenue +86%
  • TG
    THE GREAT AMERICAN SONGBOOK FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue -13%
  • GL
    GOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • CP
    Conner Prairie Museum Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +59%
  • IA
    INDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +57%
  • Indiana University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
3
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc

Benefit, perform, and carry out the charitable, educational, and other exempt purposes of indiana university health ball memorial hospital, inc. ("iu health ball memorial hospital") and related organizations, and to support activities…

—
4
Goodwill Education Initiatives Inc

To provide educational opportunities designed to enable young people and adults to enhance their success in life and work; to develop, own, and operate one or more charter schools.

Education
5
Gw Commercial Services Inc

Goodwill legacy group (glg) and its subsidiaries, gw commercial services, inc. (gwcs) and goodwill education initiatives, inc. (gei), together with goodwill foundation of central and southern indiana, inc. (the foundation) (collectively…

Employment
6
Indiana Economic Development Foundation Inc

To promote industrial and business development, diversification of indiana's economy, and overall economic growth of indiana; to promote the retention, expansion, growth, and modernization of indiana's businesses; to promote the creation…

Community Improvement
7
Indianapolis Private Industry Council

The indianapolis private industry council, inc., doing business as employindy, the workforce investment board for marion county, is a not-for-profit corporation responsible for the development of the marion county workforce. employindy…

Employment
8
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
The Indianapolis Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.

Community Improvement
10
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc

The organization's mission is to create extraordinary learning experiences across the arts, sciences and humanities that have the power to transform the lives of children and families. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
11
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
12
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for the Performing Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wheeler Mission Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $21,250 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCTHE GREAT AMERICAN SONGBOOK FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GREAT AMERICAN SONGBOOK FOUNDATION INCConner Prairie Museum Inc: $1,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC: $9,250 · EmploymentGOODWILL LEGACY GR…JWAS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherJWAS FOUND…GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $2,000 · OtherGLEANERS F…WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $500 · Human ServicesIndiana University Foundation: $1,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$38,750Employment$9,250Other$5,500Human Services$2,500Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $21,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GREAT AMERICAN SONGBOOK FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC: $9,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetConner Prairie Museum Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W Michael & Susan Wells Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W Michael & Susan Wells Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W Michael & Susan Wells’ filings →

    More from the funding graph