Skip to content

· Private foundation

W Mack & Julia S Watkins Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$481kHuman Services$107kPublic Benefit$105kPhilanthropy$80kEducation$76kYouth Development$51kHealth$50kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIONEER THEATER COMPANY$20,000
CORP OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURC$20,000
U OF U SCHOOL MUSIC$20,000
BALLET WEST$20,000
AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,000
DAVIS HIGH SCHOOL$5,900
BOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRY$5,000
INTERMOUNTAIN SUZUKI STRING INSTITUTE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $10k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $10k → 8%UTAH PARENT CENTER: $5k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$921k · 20 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$921k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-4%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BALLET WEST
    6× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +71%
  • AI
    American Indian Services
    5× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +10%
  • US
    UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
    4× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • UO
    U OF U COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TR
    THE ROAD HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDRENS INTL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Arts Academy

Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education
2
Utah Youth Symphony Orchestra Association

To educate and inspire young musicians through exceptional ensemble training and performance opportunities in classical music.

Arts & Culture
3
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
4
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
5
Utah Museum of Contemporary Art

The Utah Museum of Contemporary Art believes in the power of the art of our time. Through programming, advocacy, and collaboration, we work with artists and communities to build a better world.

Arts & Culture
6
Dyslexia Center of Utah New Heights Inc

We inspire and transform students with learning differences into confident, independent, and successful readers. We collaborate with colleagues and members of the community for the welfare and value of our diverse learners.

Education
7
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
8
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
9
Art Access

The mission of Art Access is to build a diverse and inclusive arts community in Utah through creative opportunities for people with disabilities, and other marginalized communities, and through public engagement with the arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
11
Comunidades Unidas

We are dedicated to empowering the Latino community in Utah to recognize and achieve their own potential and become a positive force for change in the larger community.

Human Services
12
Salt Lake Arts Academy

To prepare students to become confident and creative builders of their future, equipped through the arts and academics to take responsibility for shaping their communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mundi Project; the most unlike its peers is The Road Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIONEER THEATER COMPANY: $120,000 · OtherPIONEER THEATER COMPANYU OF U SCHOOL MUSIC: $120,000 · OtherU OF U SCHOOL MUSICCORP OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURC: $100,000 · OtherCORP OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCLDS PHILANTHROPIES: $50,000 · OtherLDS PHILANTHROPIESLDS CHARITIES: $30,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN -SLC: $30,000 · OtherTREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30,000 · Other+16 more: $175,228 · Other+16 moreBALLET WEST: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET WESTUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $60,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY & OPER…THE MUNDI PROJECT: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUNDI PROJECTZION CANYON MESA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureZION CANYON MESA+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Indian Services: $80,000 · Human ServicesAmerican I…THE ROAD HOME: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD H…Utah Parent Center Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesDavis Technical College Foundation Inc: $69,182 · EducationMONGOL ECOLOGY CENTER: $5,000 · Environment
Other$655,228Arts & Culture$186,000Human Services$95,000Education$69,182Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBALLET WEST: $100,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $80,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDavis Technical College Foundation Inc: $69,182 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUNDI PROJECT: $11,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZION CANYON MESA: $10,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetDavis Education Foundation: $6,782 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Parent Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INTERMOUNTAIN SUZUKI STRING INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMONGOL ECOLOGY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
  • Who funds American Indian Services ↗
  • Who funds Davis Technical College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE MUNDI PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
  • Who funds ZION CANYON MESA ↗
  • Who funds Davis Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Utah Parent Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERMOUNTAIN SUZUKI STRING INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MONGOL ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Simmons Family Foundation · Joan and Tim Fenton Family Foundation · Wadman Foundation · The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W Mack & Julia S Watkins Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W Mack & Julia S Watkins Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to W Mack & Julia S Watkins Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to W Mack & Julia S Watkins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W Mack & Julia S Watkins’ filings →

    More from the funding graph