Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

W Keith Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$43kFood & Nutrition$24kEducation$23kScience & Tech$14kArts & Culture$8kEnvironment$8kPhilanthropy$5kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL$10,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$7,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
RIVER CITY BRASS BAND$5,000
SEARCH INC$5,000
UPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTER$5,000
LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PA$5,000
SHADYSIDE ACADEMY$5,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO - IVEY BUSINESS SCHOOL$2,500
ST MARGARET FOUNDATION$2,500
UPMC CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,500
SHADYSIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,500
DM CARE$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN - EDWARDS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving89% of grant dollars ($127k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($15k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SECOND HARVEST: $1k → 11%SECOND HARVEST: $500 → 11%SECOND HARVEST: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
MD
AZ
DC
FL

Beyond the US11% of all-years giving ($15k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$15k · 4 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$63k · 13 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$63k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+70%

Still filing today

69%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +47%
  • CJ
    CR JRS CHIP
    3× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • TN
    THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
2
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
3
Scenic Pittsburgh

To protect, preserve, and promote the scenic resources of southwestern pennsylvania.

Environment
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
6
Sustainable Pittsburgh

Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.

Environment
7
Allegheny Conference On Community Development

See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…

8
Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation

Phlf works within a 250-mile radius of pittsburgh, pennsylvania to: identify and save historically significant places; renew historic neighborhoods, towns, and urban areas; preserve historic farms and historically designated landscapes;…

Arts & Culture
9
Allegheny County Conservation District

The Allegheny County Conservation District is an urban conservation district that engages and leads through partnerships, innovation, and implementation to conserve, promote, and improve Allegheny Countys natural resources.

Environment
10
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
11
Pittsburgh Venture Capital Association

The pittsburgh venture capital association was founded in 1982 to catalyze venture investment and entrepreneurialism in western pennsylvania. since then it has become the leading voice of private equity investors in the region.through a…

12
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is University of Western Ontario Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr15%30%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%6%10–20yr18%10%20–35yr15%55%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
5,764/41,382

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
15/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO FOUNDATION INCALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL — $10,000 · OtherALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITALUPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTER — $5,500 · OtherUPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTERUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWANSearch Inc — $5,000 · OtherSearch IncTHE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO FOUNDATION INCUPMC CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $3,000 · Other+28 more — $29,150 · Other+28 moreGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $24,200 · Food & NutritionGREATER PITTSBURGH …LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthLUNG CANCER …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC — $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARE…ST MARGARET FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthST MARGARET …EPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA — $2,200 · HealthEPILEPSY ASS…IMERMAN ANGELS — $1,000 · HealthIMERMAN ANGE…SHADY SIDE ACADEMY — $5,000 · EducationCR JRS CHIP — $2,300 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $1,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationRIVER CITY BRASS BAND INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA — $1,000 · Arts & CultureRIVERLIFE — $1,500 · EnvironmentAUDUBON SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA — $1,500 · EnvironmentPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $1,300 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentGarden Club of Allegheny County — $500 · EnvironmentTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$76,650Food & Nutrition$24,200Health$15,700Education$9,050Arts & Culture$6,000Environment$5,800Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $24,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER CITY BRASS BAND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSearch Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCR JRS CHIP — $2,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA — $2,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Harvest — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRICK ART & HISTORICAL CENTER INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERLIFE — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPittsburgh Botanic Garden — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUDUBON SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC — $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAspinwall Riverfront Park Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFECHRONICLES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGarden Club of Allegheny County — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA27.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Simpson Family Foundation U/A Dtd 10/19/1999 · Hillman Family Foundations · The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43 · The Grable Foundation · Adams Foundation Inc · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization W Keith Smith Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to W Keith Smith Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to W Keith Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph