Skip to content

· Private foundation

W Earl Richards Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$950k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$7.4MEducation$1.3MInternational$736kYouth Development$526kPhilanthropy$434kHousing & Shelter$364kHuman Services$307kAnimals$137kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $383k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.4M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS$950,000
THE SIGNATRY A GLOBAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$500,000
SECOND WIND PROGRAMS INC$125,000
VAPOR INTERNATIONAL$103,480
GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES$55,000
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY$50,000
EQUIP LEADERSHIP INC$50,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$25,000
UNION UNIVERSITY$25,000
THE WELLHOUSE INC$20,000
CHRIST HEALTH CENTER$15,000
MILO'S FOUNDATION INC$15,000
JAMES E HUGHES JR FOUNDATION$5,200
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$1,500
CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PASSTHROUGH$912
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $911k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $154k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $130k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $110k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $104k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $103k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $103k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 18%VAPOR INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 18%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $55k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $15k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%TRIVELA FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CA
KS
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 20 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
15

Total granted

$11M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+571%

Still filing today

65%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    Vapor Ministries Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $735k · revenue +275%
  • SW
    Second Wind Programs Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $525k · revenue +123%
  • EL
    EQUIP Leadership Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $275k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • BT
    BOK TOWER GARDENS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +12%
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • N(
    NEVERTHIRST (COMPASSION OUTREACH MINISTRIES)
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
5
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
6
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
7
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
8
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
9
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
12
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tipping Point Community; the most unlike its peers is Milos Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SIGNATRY A GLOBAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $4,285,445 · OtherTHE SIGNATRY A GLOBAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONCHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INC: $2,648,731 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HIGHLANDS INCHIGHLANDS COLLEGE: $1,083,333 · OtherHIGHLANDS COLLEGESecond Wind Programs Inc: $525,000 · OtherSecond Wind Programs Inc+17 more: $456,075 · OtherVapor Ministries Inc: $734,608 · Human ServicesVapor Min…GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesGRACE HOU…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMILOS FOUNDATION INC: $211,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $190,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $6,700 · PhilanthropyEQUIP Leadership Inc: $275,000 · ReligionUNION UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · EducationSamford University: $11,000 · Education+2 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $126,000 · Housing & ShelterChrist Health Center Inc: $95,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 · Health
Other$8,998,584Human Services$910,608Philanthropy$407,700Religion$275,000Education$172,000Housing & Shelter$126,000Health$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVapor Ministries Inc: $734,608 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetSecond Wind Programs Inc: $525,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEQUIP Leadership Inc: $275,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMILOS FOUNDATION INC: $211,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $190,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $175,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $126,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetChrist Health Center Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOK TOWER GARDENS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSamford University: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON PARTNERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $7,173 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetJAMES E HUGHES JR FOUNDATION: $5,200 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIVELA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMountain Brook City Schools Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vapor Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Second Wind Programs Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUIP Leadership Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILOS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOK TOWER GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds Samford University ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON PARTNERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMES E HUGHES JR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds TRIVELA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Brook City Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS18.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Arlington Partners Charitable Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W Earl Richards Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W Earl Richards Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bok Tower Gardens Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to W Earl Richards Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to W Earl Richards Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on W Earl Richards’ filings →

More from the funding graph