· Private foundation
W Clark Hagan Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC | $18,579 |
| STELLA MARIS INC | $18,579 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES5× · 2020–2025 · $79k · revenue +69%
- SMSTELLA MARIS INC2× · 2024–2025 · $34k · revenue +34%
- DUDEPAUL USA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- GRGATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTERone grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue +3%
- TJTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITALgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +42%
- VPVETERANS PLACE OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2022 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
Gosnold, inc. was established for the rehabilitation of substance abusers and offers addiction and mental health treatment on an in-patient and out-patient basis.
Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
To provide comprehensive care and expert recovery services to any individual or family on their journey to restore hope, health, and healing; to empower those in need to get the compassionate and personalized support they deserve to help…
To provide a safe and structured environment for addicts and alcoholics to come and find hope and restoration.
Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.
Straight and narrow (s&n) develops and delivers quality integrated straight and narrow program, paterson and comprehensive specialized health care, education and prevention services to our community. our experienced and highly qualified…
Alcohol and Drug Rehabilitation
To assist individuals recovering from addiction, implement lifestyle changes, gain employment and housing
A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gaudenzia Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds The Baltimore Station Inc ↗
- Who funds STELLA MARIS INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds RENEWAL INC ↗
- Who funds GAUDENZIA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ADDICTION RECOVERY MINISTRY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization W Clark Hagan Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Family Services — 73% of income from government
- The Baltimore Station Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Johns Hopkins Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.