Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

W Clark Hagan Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
67%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$18,579
Largest grant, FY2025
$18,579
Organizations funded a year
2 to 5
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$754k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations W Clark Hagan Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 78% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving2$37k0%
FY20243$46k67%
FY20232$36k50%
FY20225$66k40%
FY20212$38k50%
FY20203$40k100%
FY20192$41k50%
FY20183$41k100%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$164kHealth$102kArts & Culture$66kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$16kEmployment$13kCrime & Legal$2k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center for Family Services$78,71150%
The Baltimore Station Inc$45,69221%
Stella Maris Inc$33,57920%
Gateway Rehabilitation Center$20,68710%
Depaul USA Inc$20,00020%
The Johns Hopkins Hospital$17,58010%
Three Rivers Youth$16,00011%
Renewal Inc$12,86110%
Gaudenzia Inc$12,50010%
Center for Family Services Inc$12,00011%
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of W Clark Hagan Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center for Family Services$78,71150%
The Baltimore Station Inc$45,69221%
Stella Maris Inc$33,57920%
Gateway Rehabilitation Center$20,68710%
Depaul USA Inc$20,00020%
The Johns Hopkins Hospital$17,58010%
Three Rivers Youth$16,00011%
Renewal Inc$12,86110%
Gaudenzia Inc$12,50010%
Center for Family Services Inc$12,00011%
Addiction Recovery Ministry$1,81713%

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($111k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget W Clark Hagan Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCenter for Family Services: $78,711 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Baltimore Station Inc: $45,692 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetStella Maris Inc: $33,579 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGateway Rehabilitation Center: $20,687 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDepaul USA Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Johns Hopkins Hospital: $17,580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThree Rivers Youth: $16,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRenewal Inc: $12,861 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGaudenzia Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Family Services Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAddiction Recovery Ministry: $1,817 over 1y, 3.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare W Clark Hagan Trust with peer funders

About W Clark Hagan Trust

How much does W Clark Hagan Trust give?
W Clark Hagan Trust reported 2 grants totaling $37,158 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 5 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does W Clark Hagan Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (43%), Health (27%), Arts & Culture (17%).
Who are W Clark Hagan Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Center for Family Services ($79k), The Baltimore Station Inc ($46k), Stella Maris Inc ($34k).
Does W Clark Hagan Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does W Clark Hagan Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as W Clark Hagan Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is W Clark Hagan Trust based?
W Clark Hagan Trust is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on W Clark Hagan’s filings →

More from the funding graph