Skip to content

· Private foundation

W & J Sales Family Fdn-Dima

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$795kPhilanthropy$260kEducation$47kAnimals$42kYouth Development$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUTTERFLY EQUITY FOUNDATION$50,000
FAMILY CHURCH$50,000
WOODSIDE BIBLE CHURCH OF TROY$25,000
BARNABAS MINISTRIES OF MICHIGAN$25,000
HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE$10,000
BETHESDA CHRISTIAN CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+17%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyAnimalsReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WOODSIDE VISION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $307k
  • BE
    BUTTERFLY EQUITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $260k · revenue +938% · 59% of their budget
  • WB
    WOODSIDE BIBLE CHURCH OF TROY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $255k

Funded once

  • HA
    HARLEM ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -8%
  • GM
    GIRLS MATTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • OC
    OAKLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Butterfly Effect Project Inc

Empower young girls by giving them the tools to assist in achieving emotionally stable and self confident futures, in hopes of bringing forth a generation of women who are strong, independent and knowledgeable.

Youth Development
2
Mercy Education Project

Mercy education project is a female-centric space dedicated to personal growth and stability, where quality education, access to resources, encouragement, and empowerment are the vehicles for their future success. mep creates a learning…

Education
3
Big Brothers Big Sisters Michigan

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
4
Hatch School

The Hatch School is a high school centering girls. The Hatch School seeks to unleash the brilliance, compassion, and voices of young women by cultivating their academic and personal power.

—
5
Evans Scholars Foundation - Michigan

Educational.

Education
6
Willows Academy

To help cooperating parents form the characters of their daughters so that the girls grow up to become competent, responsible professional women, who raise strong families, and live by Christian moral principles as taught by the Catholic…

Education
7
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
8
The Potters House

The Potters House provides a Christ-centered education to children of all ethnic heritages and income levels, equipping them to serve God and society to their fullest potential.

Education
9
Oaks Tutorials

Partnering with parents in providing an excellent classical education founded upon a biblical worldview.

Education
10
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
11
Oak Grove Classical Academy

Oak Grove Classical Academy provides a Christ-centered, classical education utilizing a University Model.

Education
12
The Youth Connection Inc

The Youth Connection is committed to connecting all youth and their families in metro Detroit to a brighter future by providing quality programs and supportive services.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women of Tomorrow Mentor & Scholarship Program Detroit Metro; the most unlike its peers is Butterfly Equity Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODSIDE VISION FOUNDATION: $307,000 · OtherWOODSIDE VISION FOUNDATIONWOODSIDE BIBLE CHURCH OF TROY: $255,000 · OtherWOODSIDE BIBLE CHURCH OF TROYFAMILY CHURCH INC: $150,000 · OtherFAMILY CHURCH INCWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR & SCHOLARSHIP: $30,000 · Other+4 more: $10,000 · OtherBUTTERFLY EQUITY FOUNDATION: $260,000 · PhilanthropyBUTTERFLY EQUITY FOUNDATI…BARNABAS MINISTRIES OF MICHIGAN: $75,000 · ReligionDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $40,000 · AnimalsHARLEM ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationOAKLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,000 · EducationGIRLS MATTER: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$752,000Philanthropy$260,000Religion$75,000Animals$40,000Education$17,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUTTERFLY EQUITY FOUNDATION: $260,000 over 6y, 59% of budgetBARNABAS MINISTRIES OF MICHIGAN: $75,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS MATTER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOAKLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUTTERFLY EQUITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS MINISTRIES OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS MATTER ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization W & J Sales Family Fdn-Dima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from W & J Sales Family Fdn-Dima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on W & J Sales Family Fdn-Dima’s filings →

    More from the funding graph