Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vollman Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$0
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$114kEducation$38kArts & Culture$15kCrime & Legal$12kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$6kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Victoria and Albert Museum Americas Foundation$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $10k → 7%RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $8k → 17%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $20k → 10%STOMP OUT BULLYING CORP: $8k → 17%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $20k → 10%Victoria and Albert Museum Americas Foundation: $12k → 17%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $13k → 10%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $5k → 17%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $13k → 10%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AN: $5k → 17%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $10k → 10%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $10k → 10%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $10k → 10%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $10k → 10%SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $1k → 10%AUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC: $3k → 10%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - THE LONGHORN F: $24k → 10%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - THE LONGHORN F: $13k → 10%AUSTIN TRINITY SCHOOL DBA TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $500 → 10%COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Vollman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Vollman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 3 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$147k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+35%

Still filing today

33%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Food & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalCrime & LegalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF
    5× · 2017–2021 · $106k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - THE LONGHORN F
    2× · 2017–2018 · $38k
  • SB
    SIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SO
    STOMP OUT BULLYING CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +6%
  • RP
    RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +18%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
United States Tennis Association- Middle States Section

The org. is a section of the united states tennis assoc. and is dedicated to carrying out the goals of the national assoc. within its region, particularly with respect to promoting tennis opportunities for juniors and adults of all…

—
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
5
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
6
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
10
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
11
The National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences Inc

To be the preeminent organization that recognizes, encourages and promotes excellence in the television, cable and related industries through education and the bestowing of the emmy award to industry professionals who exemplify that…

Community Improvement
12
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Victoria and Albert Museum Americas Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OF: $106,000 · OtherSETON HEALTHCARE - SETON FUND OF THE DAUGHTERS OFTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - THE LONGHORN F: $37,632 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN - THE LONGHORN F+7 more: $20,500 · Other+7 moreVICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $12,000 · InternationalNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $10,000 · PhilanthropySTOMP OUT BULLYING CORP: $7,500 · Crime & LegalRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$164,132International$12,000Philanthropy$10,000Crime & Legal$7,500Environment$7,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOMP OUT BULLYING CORP: $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLUS Fund Paid Leave for the United States: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIDE BY SIDE KIDS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN TRINITY SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vollman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vollman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vollman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vollman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vollman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph