Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Vogt Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
60%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$365,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 10
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$39M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 60% of the organizations Vogt Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 60% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$1.2M40%
FY20235$670k60%
FY20227$890k43%
FY20214$670k50%
FY20207$1.4M43%
FY201910$1.7M80%
FY20174$277kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$2.2MAnimals$1.9MEnvironment$1.1MRecreation & Sports$850kEducation$650kHealth$300kCivil Rights$250kScience & Tech$250kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Good Food Institute Inc$2,000,00063%
Oceanic Preservation Society$965,000321%
Game Changers Corp$850,0003n/a
Animal Legal Defense Fund Inc$500,00022%
Prostate Cancer Foundation$300,00011%
Mercy for Animals Inc$261,25032%
Charlies Acres$255,00014%
The Humane League$250,00012%
Humane World for Animals Inc$166,76430%
Humane Farming Association$125,00032%
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of Vogt Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Good Food Institute Inc$2,000,00063%
Oceanic Preservation Society$965,000321%
Game Changers Corp$850,0003n/a
Animal Legal Defense Fund Inc$500,00022%
Prostate Cancer Foundation$300,00011%
Mercy for Animals Inc$261,25032%
Charlies Acres$255,00014%
The Humane League$250,00012%
Humane World for Animals Inc$166,76430%
Humane Farming Association$125,00032%
Plant Based Foods Institute$105,00024%
Generation Awakening$100,000148%
Animal Outlook Inc$95,00023%
Humane America Animal Foundation$65,00031%
New Roots Institute$50,00015%
Redford Center Inc$50,00011%
Animals United Movement$31,25013%
Independent Arts & Media$25,00012%
Animal Recovery Mission Inc$25,00011%
Logistically Nonprofit Services Inc$25,000116%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($611k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Vogt Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 19 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Good Food Institute Inc: $2,000,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetOceanic Preservation Society: $965,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetAnimal Legal Defense Fund Inc: $500,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetProstate Cancer Foundation: $300,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMercy for Animals Inc: $261,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCharlies Acres: $255,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetThe Humane League: $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $166,764 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Farming Association: $125,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPlant Based Foods Institute: $105,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGeneration Awakening: $100,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetAnimal Outlook Inc: $95,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetHumane America Animal Foundation: $65,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $50,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetRedford Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAnimals United Movement: $31,250 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetIndependent Arts & Media: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAnimal Recovery Mission Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLogistically Nonprofit Services Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greenbaum FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greenbaum Foundation · The Quinn Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Vogt Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vogt Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Vogt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Vogt Foundation

How much does Vogt Foundation give?
Vogt Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $1,245,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Vogt Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (29%), Animals (25%), Environment (15%).
Who are Vogt Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: The Good Food Institute Inc ($2.0M), Oceanic Preservation Society ($965k), Game Changers Corp ($850k).
Does Vogt Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Vogt Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Vogt Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Greenbaum Foundation, The Quinn Foundation, Rsf Social Finance Inc.
Where is Vogt Foundation based?
Vogt Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vogt’s filings →

More from the funding graph