Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vna Home Support Services Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$169kHealth$146kYouth Development$77kHousing & Shelter$20kCrime & Legal$15kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$2kReligion$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRITTENTON SERVICES INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC$5,000
KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE$5,000
WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC$5,000
FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS$5,000
CHANGE INC$5,000
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM$5,000
AUGUSTA LEVY CENTER$5,000
HARMONY HOUSE$2,500
WELLSPRING PREGNANCY CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $7k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $3k → 17%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $7k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $3k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $3k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $1k → 17%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $7k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $5k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $5k → 15%HELPING HEROES: $5k → 15%THE LIFE HUB: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $5k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $5k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $5k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $4k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $4k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $4k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $4k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $4k → 15%YWCA WHEELING: $3k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $3k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 15%HARMONY HOUSE: $3k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $3k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$389k · 21 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$389k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-16%

Still filing today

57%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +100%
  • LC
    LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +22%
  • RN
    RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -16%
  • HH
    HELPING HEROES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • LH
    LIFE HUB INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
3
Women Helping Women

Women helping women prevents gender-based violence and empowers all survivors.

—
4
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
5
Charles County Harc Inc

Provide residential and human services to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
6
Human Services Center

Human services center is a comprehensive community behavioral healthcare provider that provides mental health and development disability services to lawrence county residents.

Human Services
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
9
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
10
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
11
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

—
12
Wvhy Inc

The organization is a community-based mutual-aid nonprofit, providing supplies and support to people experiencing homelessness and advocating for compassionate, just, and collaborative solutions to homelessness.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc; the most unlike its peers is Life Hub Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $41,250 · OtherLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTERAUGUSTA LEVY CENTER: $37,250 · OtherAUGUSTA LEVY CENTERCRITTENTON SERVICES: $22,500 · OtherCRITTENTON SERVICESEASTER SEAL REHAB CENTER: $21,750 · OtherEASTER SEAL REHAB CENTERKING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE: $20,000 · OtherKING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CAREORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL: $16,500 · OtherORCHARD PARK HOSPITALWHEELING OHIO COUNTY BD OF HEALTH: $14,500 · OtherWHEELING OHIO COUNTY BD OF HEALTHHOUSE OF CARPENTER: $10,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $7,500 · Other+8 more: $28,500 · Other+8 moreRUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC: $36,750 · Human ServicesRUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INCFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $32,250 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INCYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $30,750 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INCTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INCYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $6,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HEROES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLIFE HUB INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $4,500 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $47,250 · HealthWHEELING HEALTH R…THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC: $14,500 · HealthTHE UPPER OHIO VA…GABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA: $5,000 · HealthGABRIEL PROJECT O…+1 more: $1,500 · HealthCHANGE INC: $10,000 · EmploymentOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $3,500 · EnvironmentGROW OHIO VALLEY INC: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$219,750Human Services$130,750Health$68,250Employment$10,000Environment$3,500Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $47,250 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $41,250 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetRUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC: $36,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $32,250 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $30,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC: $14,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCHANGE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHELPING HEROES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIFE HUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGROW OHIO VALLEY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE HUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GROW OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust CompanyWV28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Robert L and Helen E Levenson Family Charit Fndtn · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Robert L& Helen E Levenson Family Charitable Tr · Helping Hand Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vna Home Support Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vna Home Support Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vna Home Support Services Inc?

Find your warmest path to Vna Home Support Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vna Home Support Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph