Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vivian & Jerry Grenier Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Animals$30kHealth$7kInternational$2kOther$13k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$600
Median grant
6
States reached
$192k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY$1,200
FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION$1,200
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$1,200
SONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION$1,200
MERCY SHIPS$600
LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE$600
THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$600
EQUINE ADVOCATES$600
ALLY CAT ALLIES$600
OHLONE HUMANE SOCIETY$600
THE HUMANE FARMING ASSOC$600
SAN FRANCISCO SPCA$300
REDROVER$300
RANCHO ROBEN RESCUES$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE: $600 → 8%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $600 → 8%SUNRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%EQUINE ADVOCATES: $600 → 11%MERCY SHIPS: $600 → 12%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%ALLEY CAT ALLIES: $600 → 8%FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE: $600 → 8%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $600 → 8%SUNRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%OHLONE HUMANE SOCIETY: $600 → 10%EQUINE ADVOCATES: $600 → 11%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%ALLY CAT ALLIES: $600 → 8%FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE: $600 → 8%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $600 → 8%SUNRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%EQUINE ADVOCATES: $600 → 11%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%ALLEY CAT ALLIES: $600 → 8%FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%LAKE TAHOE WILDLIFE CARE: $600 → 8%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $600 → 8%SONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%EQUINE ADVOCATES: $600 → 11%BEST FREINDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%ALLEY CAT ALLIES: $600 → 8%FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%LAKE TAHOE WILDFIRE CARES: $600 → 8%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $600 → 8%SUNRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%EQUINE ADVOCATES: $600 → 11%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%ALLY CAT ALLIES: $600 → 8%FOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $600 → 8%SUNRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%EQUINE ADVOCATES: $600 → 11%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1k → 9%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SILICON VALLEY: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$50k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$50k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +39%
  • SE
    SONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +52%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • LT
    LAKE TAHOE WILDFIRE CARES
    one grant, 2021 · $600
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE
    one grant, 2024 · $250 · revenue +24%
  • PV
    PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE
    one grant, 2024 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
2
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
5
Fix Our Ferals

Fix our ferals (dba animal fix clinic) provides affordable, excellent quality spay/neuter and other life-saving and life-changing surgeries for companion dogs, cats and community cats.

Animals
6
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

7
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
8
Animal Rescue Mission

To rescue and rehabilitate dogs and cats and place them in forever homes.

Animals
9
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
10
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
11
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
12
Actors and Others for Animals

To eliminate pet overpopulation, ensure good care and protection for pet companions, and provide referral and financial support for economically challenged pet guardians.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ohlone Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $7,200 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY — $7,200 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEYTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $3,600 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTERAlley Cat Allies Inc — $3,600 · AnimalsAlley Cat Allies IncEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $3,600 · AnimalsEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATEDThe Ohlone Humane Society Inc — $2,100 · AnimalsThe Ohlone Humane Society IncTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,800 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMAL…+3 more — $950 · AnimalsFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $7,200 · OtherFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FO…Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc — $2,975 · OtherLake Tahoe Wildlife Care In…UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $1,800 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA R…LAKE TAHOE WILDFIRE CARES — $600 · Other+2 more — $250 · OtherSONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION — $7,200 · HealthSONRISE EQUESTR…+1 more — $100 · HealthMercy Ships International — $2,100 · International
Animals$30,050Other$12,825Health$7,300International$2,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $7,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION — $7,200 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFOREVER YOUNG FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $7,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY — $7,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER — $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc — $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc — $2,975 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohlone Humane Society Inc — $2,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRancho Roben Rescues Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vivian & Jerry Grenier Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph