· Public charity
Vital Voices Global Partnership Inc
Vital voices global partnership's mission is to identify, invest in and bring visibility to extraordinary women around the world by unleashing their leadership potential to transform lives and accelerate peace and prosperity in their communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $1,996,336 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,561,711 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,565,375 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $629k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN SUPPORT FOUNDATION | $628,881 |
| MINA'S LIST INC | $230,000 |
| WOMEN'S REGIONAL NETWORK | $169,860 |
| AFGHAN-AMERICAN FOUNDATION | $139,419 |
| WOMEN FOR AFGHAN WOMEN | $130,000 |
| THE 30 BIRDS FOUNDATION | $116,800 |
| TALLER SALUD | $105,819 |
| CODE FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY | $100,000 |
| UNITED VOICES 4 PEACE | $81,468 |
| AFGHAN-AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION | $80,000 |
| COUNTERPART INTERNATIONAL INC | $80,000 |
| NATIONAL ABLE NETWORKTEAM THEMIS | $58,489 |
| ONE HAPPY MAMA | $25,000 |
| RED DOT FOUNDATION GLOBAL | $25,000 |
| SURVIVOR FUND HUB | $8,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $459k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $5.5M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $2.7M to organizations and $2.7M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE.
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
Stated purpose: GRANT TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE. · URGENT ASSISTANCE FUND PAYMENT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC6× · 2017–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +74%
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC5× · 2018–2022 · $483k · revenue +36%
HomeWorks Trenton2× · 2020–2022 · $36k · revenue ×15
Funded once
- LKLINA KHALIFEH TRAINING CENTER LLCone grant, 2020 · $88k
- TKThe Knowledge House Fellowship Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +169%
- SFSRD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
IANGEL is an international network dedicated to advancing gender equity and protecting the human and civil rights of women and girls, through peaceful, legal means. IANGEL advances its mission by connecting the lawyers and legal…
Ending impunity for conflict related sexual violence
To empower women and promote gender equality in developing countries; to ensure people participate in and benefit equally from donor and civil society investments in all countries; to provide assistance for the advancement of science,…
In countries affected by conflict and war, women for women international (women for women) supports the most marginalized women to earn and save money, improve health and well-being, influence decisions in their home and community, and…
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
Together women rise champions gender equality because womens rights are human rights. when women and girls are treated equally, the world is healthier, safer, more peaceful, inclusive, and economically just for everyone.
Women in Migration Network (WIMN), an international non-governmental organization, identifies and promotes human rights-based and feminist global migration policies. We lift up and support the experiences, voices and agency of all women in…
United Women of the Horn (UWH) exists to advance the leadership, safety, and civic participation of Black immigrant women, with a focus on East African communities. The organization delivers trauma-informed, culturally grounded programs…
Global Network Building for Gender Equality and Women's Rights Activists: Fostering exchange, collaboration, and mutual support for joint efforts in capacity building and technical assistance, while deepening the understanding of gender…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Womens Regional Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds Minas List Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS ↗
- Who funds Womens Regional Network ↗
- Who funds AFGHAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
- Who funds THE 30 BIRDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 412 FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds TALLER SALUD INC ↗
- Who funds CODE FOR SCIENCE & SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED VOICES 4 PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds COUNTERPART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds AFGHAN AMERICAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Knowledge House Fellowship Inc ↗
- Who funds HomeWorks Trenton ↗
- Who funds SRD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RED DOT FOUNDATION GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds CHELSEA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds ONE HAPPY MAMA ↗
- Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds KARAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AnnieCannons Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds RISE INC ↗
- Who funds INHERSHOES INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH FOR MOMS ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Novo Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Open Society Institute · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · New Venture Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vital Voices Global Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- HomeWorks Trenton — 6% of income from government
- Code for Science & Society Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.