· Public charity
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
Vns health is one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
- $250k+3 grants · $4.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VNS Health Home Care II | $2,523,434 |
| VNS Health Hospice Care | $1,344,466 |
| VNS Health Personal Care | $398,490 |
| REGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC | $30,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY FUND INC | $12,500 |
| DR RAMON TALLAJ FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| Mount Sinai Health System | $6,000 |
| Medicare Rights Center | $6,000 |
| BROOKLYN CHINESE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC | $5,500 |
| LATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $12.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VNVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK HOSPICE CARE8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +10%
- THThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +102%
- LCLATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS5× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- NYNew York Universitygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +76%
- FFFoundation for a Better Puerto Rico Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +33%
- BHBRIGHTPOINT HEALTHone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…
Healthcare choices ny, inc., a federally qualified health center licensed by the state of new york is an outpatient health center providing community based health services primarily to persons who may have a mental health diagnosis or be…
Operating as an integral part of the nyc health + hospitals ("h+h"), formerly the new york city health and hospitals corporation. nyda will further h+h's tax-exempt charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by enhancing the…
Vna of hudson valley was formed to provide home health care to the people of westchester county. services include nursing; physical, occupational and speech therapy; medical social services; and home health aides. our mission is to provide…
Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…
We provide greater access to high quality medical care and keep our communities healthy through an integrated care system that respects the diversity of our communities and addresses both the health needs and unique factors that shape them.
We provide greater access to high quality medical care and keep our communities healthy through an integrated care system that respects the diversity of our communities and addresses both the health needs and unique factors that shape them.
To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…
The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…
To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Partners Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for a Better Puerto Rico Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK HOME CARE II ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK HOSPICE CARE ↗
- Who funds NEW PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RAIN TOTAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds DOMINICAN MEDICAL-DENTAL COMMUNITY OUTREACH SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds Village Center for Care Fund ↗
- Who funds Foundation for a Better Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTPOINT HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SUN RIVER HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIGHT TO DREAM INC ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL JERSEY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE ↗
- Who funds HARLEM WEEK INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN CHINESE-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York · Montefiore Medical Center · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Visiting Nurse Service of New York funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.