Skip to content

· Private foundation

Virginia W Little Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$46kHuman Services$27kHealth$18kEducation$9kReligion$9k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,585
Median grant
4
States reached
$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANTI-CRUELTY SOCIETY$1,585
CHILDREN HOME & AID$1,585
KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH$1,585
THE SEEING EYE INC$1,585
GLENWOOD ACADEMY$1,585
KAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER$1,585
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$1,585
VIVISECTION INVESTIGATION LEAGUE$1,585
KIDS ABOVE ALL ILLINOIS$1,585
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES$1,585
NEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY$1,585
NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM$1,585
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE SEEING EYE INC: $2k → 4%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $2k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $2k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $2k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $2k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$108k
$0

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Anti-Cruelty Society
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +30%
  • KA
    Kids Above All Illinois
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +68%
  • VI
    VIVISECTION INVESTIGATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +17%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

    A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

    Animals
    2
    The Animal Haven Inc

    The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

    Animals
    3
    Illinois Animal Welfare Networkers Association
    Animals
    4
    All About Animals Rescue

    All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

    Animals
    5
    Animal Rescue League of Boston

    The animal rescue league of boston's vision is to confront animal cruelty and neglect at its root causes. through programs, services, and facilities focused on accessible animal care, public advocacy, and sustained anti-cruelty efforts...…

    Animals
    6
    A Life to Live Animal Shelter and Adoption Center

    We have a no-kill mission to save the lives of homeless cats and dogs abandoned and/or placed in kill shelters, while also providing life-saving programs and services to keep pets and their people together. through outreach, education and…

    —
    7
    Northeast Animal Shelter Inc

    To provide, promote, and advance humane protection, care and treatment of animals thru education of the public and the operation of an animal shelter which cares for, spays and neuters, and places homeless pets in permanent homes.

    —
    8
    Partners for Animal Welfare Society

    Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

    Animals
    9
    Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

    Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

    Community Improvement
    10
    Champaign County Animal Welfare League Inc

    To provide a refuge for unwanted and/or abandoned dogs and cats, provide pet adoption, pet trainng, neutering and medical treatment, and rehabilitation, with no euthanization unless in the case of incurable illness.

    Animals
    11
    North Bay Animal Services
    Animals
    12
    Animal Care Sanctuary

    Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

    Animals
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    8/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    The Anti-Cruelty Society: $10,853 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty SocietyVIVISECTION INVESTIGATION LEAGUE: $8,852 · AnimalsVIVISECTION INVESTIGATION LEAGUEKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER: $8,852 · AnimalsKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTERAnimal Welfare League: $8,852 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare LeagueNEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY: $8,563 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETYKids Above All Illinois: $8,852 · OtherKids Above All IllinoisKENILWORTH UNION CHURCH: $8,852 · OtherKENILWORTH UNION CHURCHCHILDREN HOME & AID: $8,852 · OtherCHILDREN HOME & AIDTHE SEEING EYE INC: $8,852 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INCPRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $8,852 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOMESGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $8,852 · EducationGLENWOOD …Endeavor Health Clinical Operations: $8,852 · HealthEndeavor …
    Animals$45,972Other$26,556Human Services$17,704Education$8,852Health$8,852

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $10,853 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKids Above All Illinois: $8,852 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVIVISECTION INVESTIGATION LEAGUE: $8,852 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $8,852 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $8,852 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER: $8,852 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAnimal Welfare League: $8,852 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $8,852 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES: $8,852 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY: $8,563 over 5y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
    • Who funds Kids Above All Illinois ↗
    • Who funds VIVISECTION INVESTIGATION LEAGUE ↗
    • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
    • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
    • Who funds KAY'S ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
    • Who funds Animal Welfare League ↗
    • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
    • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES ↗
    • Who funds NEW ENGLAND ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    AbbVie FoundationIL12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Virginia W Little Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia W Little Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      3get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Virginia W Little’s filings →

      More from the funding graph