Skip to content

· Private foundation

Virginia E Stauffer Scholarship 51

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$114k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY$4,500
SUNY BROCKPORT$3,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$1,500
NAZARETH UNIVERSITY$1,500
JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,500
PENN STATE$1,500
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
WV
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 8 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
31

Total granted

$53k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+12%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k
  • SB
    SUNY BROCKPORT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AS
    ALFRED STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • BW
    Baldwin Wallace University
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
9
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
10
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
11
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of New Haven; the most unlike its peers is Daemen University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYSUNY BROCKPORT: $7,500 · OtherSUNY BROCKPORTALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $7,500 · OtherALFRED STATE COLLEGEJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7,500 · OtherJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGEST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO: $3,000 · OtherFINGER LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3,000 · Other+22 more: $35,000 · Other+22 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHMERCYHURST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationMERCYHURST UNIVERSITYBaldwin Wallace University: $2,500 · EducationBaldwin Wallace UniversityNAZARETH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationCornell University: $1,500 · EducationWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationKEUKA COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationUniversity of New Haven: $1,500 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $1,500 · EducationHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $1,500 · EducationDAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Education
Other$84,500Education$29,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCYHURST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEUKA COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New Haven: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KEUKA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of New Haven ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds DAEMEN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tw Lk Mills & Tr Mills Scholar TrNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tw Lk Mills & Tr Mills Scholar Tr · Verizon Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia E Stauffer Scholarship 51 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia E Stauffer Scholarship 51. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of New Haven: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Virginia E Stauffer Scholarship 51’s filings →

More from the funding graph