Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Virginia E Stauffer Scholarship 51

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$114k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY$4,500
SUNY BROCKPORT$3,000
JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,500
NAZARETH UNIVERSITY$1,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$1,500
PENN STATE$1,500
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
WV
NC
SC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53k · 8 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
31

Total granted

$53k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+12%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k
  • JC
    JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $8k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AS
    ALFRED STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
9
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
10
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
11
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of New Haven and the most unlike its peers is Daemen University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $7,500 · OtherJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGEALFRED STATE COLLEGE — $7,500 · OtherALFRED STATE COLLEGESUNY BROCKPORT — $7,500 · OtherSUNY BROCKPORTST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYFINGER LAKES COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO — $3,000 · Other+22 more — $35,000 · Other+22 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHMERCYHURST UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationMERCYHURST UNIVERSITYBaldwin Wallace University — $2,500 · EducationBaldwin Wallace UniversityUniversity of New Haven — $1,500 · EducationHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE — $1,500 · EducationCornell University — $1,500 · EducationKEUKA COLLEGE — $1,500 · EducationST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology — $1,500 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationDAEMEN UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $1,500 · EducationNAZARETH UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · Education
Other$84,500Education$29,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCYHURST UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New Haven — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEUKA COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAEMEN UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University
  • Who funds University of New Haven
  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds KEUKA COLLEGE
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DAEMEN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tw Lk Mills & Tr Mills Scholar TrNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tw Lk Mills & Tr Mills Scholar Tr · Verizon Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Virginia E Stauffer Scholarship 51 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • University of New Haven1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph