Loading…
· Public charity
Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights
VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.
$111k
Granted FY2024
9
Grants
3
Communities
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Arts & Culture$85kEducation$70kCommunity Improvement$58kHuman Services$30kPublic Benefit$27kCivil Rights$25kOther$99k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
tenantsworkerseducationgrassroots
2020
education
2022
africantogetherget
2023
get outout vote
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 9 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$497k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Virginia Organizing Inc$30,000
- Progress Virginia$16,700
- Edu Futuro$13,000
- VA Interfaith Ct for Public Policy$10,000
- African Communities Together$10,000
- CAPAVA$10,000
- Natl Korean Am Service Educ Consort$5,000
- Sin Barreras$5,000
- Multicultural Families$5,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$357k · 11 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
2
Total granted
$357k
$27k
Still filing today
91%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATenants and Workers United3× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +668%
- NVNew Virginia Majority Education Fund3× · 2017–2020 · $49k · revenue +78%
- EFEmgage Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · $27k · revenue +238%
Funded once
- LCLULAC Council 4609one grant, 2019 · $15k
- SGSt Gabriel's Episcopal Churchone grant, 2018 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
New Virginia Majority
New Virginia Majority is a grassroots organization that empowers low income people and people of color in local communities through leadership development, trainings and workshops, issue education and advocacy, and voter education and…
Civil Rights
2
Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights
VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.
Human Services
3
Virginia Community Voice Inc
To equip neighbors in marginalized communities to realize their vision for their community and to prepare institutions to respond effectively.
Community Improvement
4
Virginia Civic Engagement Table
Civil Rights
5
Virginians Organized for Interfaith
Voice is broad-based multi-racial, multi-faith, multi-issue, multi-county, strictly non-partisan citizens' organization dedicated to making change on social justice issues (immigration, affordable housing, healthcare, etc) affected the…
Community Improvement
6
Virginia Afl-Cio
The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…
Employment
7
Virginia Center for Inclusive
VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.
Civil Rights
8
Virginia Coalition for Progressive Values
To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.
—
9
Northern Virginia Affordable Housing
Increase supply of and equitable access to affordable housing in Northern Virginia through education, advocacy, and community partnership.
Housing & Shelter
10
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Virginia
Promote civil liberties and civil rights for everyone in the commonweath of Virginia thru public education, litigation and advocacy with the goal of securing freedom and equality for all.
Civil Rights
11
Equal Justice Center
The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…
Civil Rights
12
Virginia Legal Aid Society Inc
Virginia Legal Aid Society, Inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide legal assistance in non-criminal proceedings or matters to persons financially unable to afford legal assistance.
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia New Majority Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Educacion Para Nuestro Futuro. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$98,700Arts & Culture$85,000Education$70,200Community Improvement$58,000Human Services$30,000Public Benefit$27,000Civil Rights$25,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Tenants and Workers United ↗
- Who funds Virginia Organizing Inc ↗
- Who funds New Virginia Majority Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Emgage Foundation ↗
- Who funds Natl Korean Am Service Educ Consort ↗
- Who funds Progress Virginia ↗
- Who funds Edu Futuro ↗
- Who funds VA Interfaith Ct for Public Policy ↗
- Who funds Sin Barreras ↗
- Who funds African Communities Together ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Virginia Civic Engagement Table · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · If Foundation · Weissberg Foundation · Community Catalyst Inc · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Tenants and Workers United.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~13 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.7× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 541515305 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Tenants and Workers United, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 13 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 23% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights?
Find your warmest path to Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines