Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vineyard Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$364kInternational$132kYouth Development$9kEducation$7kEnvironment$316Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$335
Median grant
9
States reached
$550k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Modern Day$10,786
Final Command Ministries$6,506
Global Development Group USA$4,703
Youth with A Mission of Montana$2,000
The Freedom Story$523
The Mission Chattanooga$457
Christian Relief Fund$445
Hickory Valley Christian Church$335
The Anglican Relief and Development$300
Chattanooga Audubon Society$259
Agape Asia$217
Seven Rivers Church$206
Ezekiel Rain$200
Clear Creek Church of Christ$200
World Relief$180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $217) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Agape Asia: $217 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
WI
IN
PA
CA
MD
AR
TN
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$464k · 15 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$464k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+135%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BARNABAS INTERNATIONAL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $173k · revenue +52%
  • MD
    MODERN DAY MISSIONS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue +222%
  • GD
    GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $78k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $38k
  • UG
    UB GLOBAL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • GC
    GLOBAL CHILDRENS AWARENESS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
4
Covenant Frontline International

The mission of CFI is to follow James 127 which states to look after orphans and widows in their distress CFI also partners with churches and organizations overseas to see this fulfilled.

International
5
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
6
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

7
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
8
Great Commission Foundation in

Missions - sponsors foreign and domestic missions and orphanages with a special emphasis on missions in India

9
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
10
Asia Connect

The organizations mission is the support, training, and equipping of Christian missionaries to Asia, the Middle East, and Africa

Religion
11
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

12
Mission Without Borders Incorporated

Mission Without Borders (MWB) is dedicated to reaching people for Christ through an international network of Christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Modern Day Missions and the most unlike its peers is Chattanooga Audubon Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%24%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 24% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BARNABAS INTERNATIONAL — $172,500 · ReligionBARNABAS INTERNATIONALMODERN DAY MISSIONS — $118,721 · ReligionMODERN DAY MISSIONSResourcing Christian Education International — $18,994 · ReligionResourcing Christian Education International+2 more — $7,057 · ReligionGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA INC — $77,590 · InternationalGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP U…The Freedom Story — $38,023 · InternationalThe Freedom Story+4 more — $6,464 · InternationalSOUTHSIDE CHURCH OF CHRIST — $37,500 · OtherSOUTHSIDE CHURCH…YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF MONTANA A CORPORATION — $9,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MIS…TEACHBEYOND INC — $6,591 · OtherTEACHBEYOND INCUB GLOBAL — $5,000 · OtherUB GLOBALGLOBAL CHILDRENS AWARENESS INC — $4,500 · OtherGLOBAL CHILDRENS…HAMILTON LIFE CHURCH — $4,354 · OtherHAMILTON LIFE CH…World Mission Continuum Society — $4,169 · OtherWorld Mission Co…+8 more — $5,570 · Other+8 moreChattanooga Audubon Society — $316 · EnvironmentCHINESE AGAPE FOUNDATION — $217 · Human Services
Religion$317,272International$122,077Other$76,684Environment$316Human Services$217

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBARNABAS INTERNATIONAL — $172,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMODERN DAY MISSIONS — $118,721 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA INC — $77,590 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetThe Freedom Story — $38,023 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetResourcing Christian Education International — $18,994 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES — $6,857 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND — $3,456 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZEKIEL RAIN INC — $828 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChattanooga Audubon Society — $316 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE AGAPE FOUNDATION — $217 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNehemiah Teams — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARNABAS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS
  • Who funds GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP USA INC
  • Who funds The Freedom Story
  • Who funds Resourcing Christian Education International
  • Who funds FINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
  • Who funds EZEKIEL RAIN INC
  • Who funds Chattanooga Audubon Society
  • Who funds CHINESE AGAPE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Nehemiah Teams
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
  • Who funds BRIDGE REFUGEE SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chattanooga Christian Community FoundationTN23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Servant Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vineyard Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph