Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vincent J Coates Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$3.0MPhilanthropy$1.8MHealth$1.7MEducation$1.1MEnvironment$805kHuman Services$790kArts & Culture$608kCommunity Improvement$236kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $940k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$50,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$500,000
NEW ENGLAND EXOTIC WILDLIFE SANCTUA$250,000
AUDUBON FLORIDA$134,000
MICKABOO COMPANION BIRD RESCUE$110,729
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$100,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$100,000
AUDUBON FLORIDA$100,000
ASH CREEK CONSERVATION ASSOC$85,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SW CENT FLORI$60,000
BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT$50,000
KEYS BESSEMER CENTER$50,000
SANTA CRUZ NATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE$50,000
BURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER$50,000
ONE EARTH CONSERVATION$50,000
UCSC FOUNDATION$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
OR
CT
RI
CA
VA
TN
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 24% of Vincent J Coates Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Vincent J Coates Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 41 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
29

Total granted

$6.8M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+13%

Still filing today

37%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $291k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $410k · revenue +38%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +26%
  • MC
    MICKABOO COMPANION BIRD RESCUE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $264k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • AC
    AUDUBON CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2021 · $214k
  • FP
    FOSTER PARROTS
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • OI
    ORCAS ISLAND FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $160k · revenue +97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orca Conservancy

Orca conservancy is working on behalf of orcinus orca, the killer whale, and protecting the wild places on which it depends.

Animals
2
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
3
Wildlife Center of the North Coast

The wildlife center of the north coast's mission is wildlife rehabilitation, education and research about wildlife and their environments. this organization serves the north and central oregon coasts, the columbia river basin, and…

Animals
4
Avian Conservation Center

To identify and address vital environmental issues by providing medical care to injured birds of prey and shorebirds, and through educational, research and conservation initiatives.

Animals
5
Wild Orca

Translating science into action to save Southern Resident killer whales from extinction.

Animals
6
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
7
The Institute for Bird Populations

The institute for bird populations enables science-based conservation of species and habitats by studying the abundance, demography, and ecology of birds and other wildlife.

Animals
8
Cascadia Research Collective

Our mission is to conduct scientific research and education in the fields of mammal biology, animal behavior and pollution ecology to promote environmental protection by providing our findings to the public, managers and other scientists.…

—
9
Channel Islands Restoration

Channel Islands Restoration protects rare and endangered plants and animals by restoring habitat in sensitive and unique natural areas on the California Channel Islands and adjacent mainland. We educate a variety of groups about the value…

Environment
10
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
11
Elakha Alliance

To restore a healthy population of sea otters to the Oregon coast and to thereby make Oregon's marine and coastal ecosystem more robust and resilient.

Environment
12
Klamath Bird Observatory

Klamath bird observatory advances bird and habitat conservation through science, education, and partnerships.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Earth Conservation; the most unlike its peers is Lyndas Phones. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW ENGLAND EXOTIC WILDLIFE SANCTUA: $650,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND EXOTIC WILDLIFE SANCTUAFOSTER PARROTSNE EXOTIC WILDLIFE SA: $390,000 · OtherFOSTER PARROTSNE EXOTIC WILDLIFE SAPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SW CENT FLORI: $310,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $286,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherAUDUBON FLORIDA: $234,000 · OtherAUDUBON CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY: $214,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $205,000 · OtherKids Empowered by Your Support Inc: $225,000 · Other+53 more: $3,395,529 · Other+53 moreORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,810,000 · PhilanthropyORCAS ISLAND COMMU…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $945,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TR…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $650,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF C…MICKABOO COMPANION BIRD RESCUE: $264,429 · AnimalsNATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE: $158,750 · AnimalsCASCADES RAPTOR CENTER: $86,250 · AnimalsBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $50,000 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $40,000 · AnimalsWOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE: $25,000 · AnimalsONE EARTH CONSERVATION: $160,000 · EnvironmentSiskiyou Land Conservancy: $145,000 · EnvironmentAsh Creek Conservation Assoc Inc: $115,000 · EnvironmentTORCHBEARR: $50,000 · EnvironmentBURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $410,000 · Recreation & SportsPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $300,000 · Health
Other$6,149,529Philanthropy$1,815,000Education$1,595,000Animals$624,429Environment$470,000Recreation & Sports$410,000Health$300,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,810,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $945,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $650,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $410,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $300,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICKABOO COMPANION BIRD RESCUE: $264,429 over 3y, 20% of budgetKids Empowered by Your Support Inc: $225,000 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetCONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $205,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetONE EARTH CONSERVATION: $160,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetNATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE: $158,750 over 5y, 14% of budgetSiskiyou Land Conservancy: $145,000 over 4y, 64% of budgetAsh Creek Conservation Assoc Inc: $115,000 over 4y, 68% of budgetGROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC: $110,800 over 4y, 14% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $101,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCASCADES RAPTOR CENTER: $86,250 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetINDEXICAL INC: $75,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTORCHBEARR: $50,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAROLINE HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetWOLF HOLLOW WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTRE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCommunity Bridges: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYNDAS PHONES: $5,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $526 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURROUGHS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MICKABOO COMPANION BIRD RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Kids Empowered by Your Support Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE EARTH CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Siskiyou Land Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds Ash Creek Conservation Assoc Inc ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds OPAL COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CASCADES RAPTOR CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Orcas Island Community Foundation · The GreerSolien Fund · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vincent J Coates Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vincent J Coates Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Groundwork Bridgeport Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc: 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vincent J Coates Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Vincent J Coates Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vincent J Coates’ filings →

More from the funding graph