Skip to content
Vincent Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Vincent Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$470k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$860kHealth$170kPhilanthropy$156kHuman Services$90kFood & Nutrition$69kInternational$61kEducation$27kAnimals$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $74k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$6,250
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE$300,000
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM$50,000
COLLINGS FOUNDATION INC$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NY$12,500
SHELBURNE FARMS$11,000
VERMONT DAY SCHOOL$10,000
LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
FLATBUSH CATS$6,250
BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION$6,250
SUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATION$6,000
SHELBURNE MUSEUM$6,000
MAPS$5,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$5,000
VERMONT FOODBANK$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHARITY WATER: $3k → 17%LUND FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 10%LUND FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 10%LUND FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 10%LUND FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 10%LUND FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 10%LUND FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
AZ
TN
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 28 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
10

Total granted

$1.5M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-11%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OLD STURBRIDGE INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $615k · revenue +55%
  • MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +104%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $61k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +8%
  • TO
    THE OLD STONE HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of the American Revolution; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD STURBRIDGE INC: $615,000 · Arts & CultureOLD STURBRIDGE INCMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $180,000 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INCSHELBURNE MUSEUM INC: $36,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCOLLINGS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · OtherCOLLINGS FOUNDATION INCSUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATION: $42,000 · OtherSUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATIONLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES: $35,312 · OtherLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIESTEEG: $30,000 · OtherTEEGVERMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $25,500 · OtherVERMONT DAY SCHOOL INCIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherMAPS: $22,313 · OtherTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · OtherBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $15,313 · Other+16 more: $90,000 · Other+16 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER: $57,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $52,750 · HealthDay Kimball Healthcare Inc: $6,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthInternational Rescue Committee INC: $61,000 · InternationalSHELBURNE FARMS: $57,000 · EnvironmentROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $20,562 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Arts & Culture$835,000Other$423,438Health$117,750International$61,000Environment$57,000Philanthropy$30,562Public Safety & Disaster$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD STURBRIDGE INC: $615,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $180,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $61,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER: $57,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS: $57,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $52,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHELBURNE MUSEUM INC: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $25,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $20,562 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLATBUSH CATS INC: $11,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLund Family Center Inc: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDay Kimball Healthcare Inc: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION: $6,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEW YORK YACHT CLUB: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen & Infants Development Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELBURNE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds FLATBUSH CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lund Family Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Day Kimball Healthcare Inc ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK YACHT CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Women & Infants Development Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vincent Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vincent Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Lund Family Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Shelburne Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • American Antiquarian Society: 7% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Old Sturbridge Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
  • Plimoth Patuxet Museums Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center: 1% of income from government
  • Day Kimball Healthcare Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vincent Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home