· Private foundation
Vincent Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $74k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OLD STURBRIDGE VILLAGE | $300,000 |
| MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| COLLINGS FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NY | $12,500 |
| SHELBURNE FARMS | $11,000 |
| VERMONT DAY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER | $10,000 |
| FLATBUSH CATS | $6,250 |
| BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION | $6,250 |
| SHELBURNE MUSEUM | $6,000 |
| SUSAN KOMEN FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| MAPS | $5,000 |
| ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| VERMONT FOODBANK | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOLD STURBRIDGE INC3× · 2020–2025 · $615k · revenue +55%
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +104%- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC4× · 2020–2024 · $61k · revenue +63%
Funded once
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +8%- TOTHE OLD STONE HOUSEone grant, 2024 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of the American Revolution and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds FLATBUSH CATS INC ↗
- Who funds Lund Family Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Day Kimball Healthcare Inc ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK YACHT CLUB ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC ↗
- Who funds Women & Infants Development Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vincent Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lund Family Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Shelburne Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- American Antiquarian Society — 7% of income from government
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- Plimoth Patuxet Museums Inc — 1% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Day Kimball Healthcare Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.