Skip to content

· Private foundation

Victoria Susan Sutton Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$339kEducation$133kHealth$122kPhilanthropy$72kAnimals$11kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Presbyterian Church$50,156
Atrium Health Giving Hope Campaign$25,000
United Way$12,000
East Carolina University$7,000
Johnson C Smith University$7,000
Univ of South Carolina$7,000
Louisburg College$3,500
North Carolina Wildlife Foundation$1,500
Arts Plus$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $4k → 12%Univ of South Carolina: $7k → 16%CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%LOUISBURG COLLEGE: $7k → 11%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 15%FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID: $7k → 10%Louisburg College: $4k → 11%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%East Carolina University: $7k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID: $7k → 10%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID: $7k → 10%WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $134k → 10%First Presbyterian Church: $50k → 10%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $37k → 10%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $35k → 10%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $32k → 10%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $31k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL CAROLINAS: $24k → 10%FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15k → 10%United Way: $12k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL CAROLINAS: $12k → 10%UNITED WAY OF THE CAROLINAS: $12k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL CAROLINAS: $12k → 10%FIRST UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 10%ARTS PLUS: $2k → 10%Arts Plus: $1k → 10%ARTS PLUS: $1k → 10%ARTS PLUS: $1k → 10%JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%Johnson C Smith University: $7k → 10%ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%Atrium Health Giving Hope Campaign: $25k → 10%ATRIUM HEALTH GIVING HOPE CAMPAIGN: $25k → 10%NC WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3k → 10%NC WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3k → 10%NC WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2k → 10%NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%North Carolina Wildlife Foundation: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$572k · 12 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$572k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+31%

Still filing today

42%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LOUISBURG COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +14%
  • NC
    North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $8k · revenue +170%
  • A
    ArtsPlus
    5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $52k · revenue +31%
  • CH
    CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE CAROLINAS
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $334,080 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHAtrium Health Giving Hope Campaign: $50,000 · OtherAtrium Health Giving Hope CampaignEast Carolina University: $28,000 · OtherWINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $28,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID: $21,000 · OtherCAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $73,600 · Other+9 moreATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $51,500 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $48,000 · PhilanthropyJOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY: $21,000 · EducationNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc: $7,500 · Environment
Other$554,680Health$51,500Philanthropy$48,000Education$21,000Environment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $51,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC: $48,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISBURG COLLEGE: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetArtsPlus: $6,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON C SMITH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOUISBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds North Carolina Wildlife Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ArtsPlus ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Victoria Susan Sutton Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Victoria Susan Sutton Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Victoria Susan Sutton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph