Skip to content

· Private foundation

Victor Sumnicht Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$11kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$9kEnvironment$8kHousing & Shelter$8kHealth$7kInternational$6kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Mosquito Hill Nature Center$1,000
Children's Welfare Development Fund$1,000
Sawa Sawa Collective$1,000
Maui Food Bank$1,000
NAOMI House$1,000
Rawhide$1,000
Street Angels$1,000
Doctors Without Borders Medecins Sans Frontieres$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Refugee Youth & Adult Empowerment Initiative: $1k → 10%Sawa Sawa Collective: $1k → 10%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Street Angels: $1k → 17%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $1k → 7%Street Angels: $1k → 17%Children's Welfare Development Fund: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$59k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-21%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CHILDRENS WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +73%
  • RI
    RAWHIDE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +72%
  • WB
    WISCONSIN BLACK HISTORAL SOCIE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • FR
    FRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • MM
    Mercy Memorial Baptist Church
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota African Womens Association

TO Promote the health and well being of African refugee and immigrant women and their families in the twin City area through research, education ,advocacy and programming

Human Services
2
Waikiki Health

To provide high quality medical and social services that are affordable and accessible for everyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
Maziwa

To promote the physical health of new mothers and infants in developing countries by providing access to heathcare products, support services, and educational programs, encouraging important practices such as breastfeeding, that prevent…

International
4
Seeds of Health Inc

The organization operates a women, infants and children (wic) clinic and primary and secondary education programs, including three charter schools and an alternative school.

—
5
Maui Rescue Mission Inc

To provide for immediate hygienic needs of the homeless on maui and to provide connections to other life changing resources.

Arts & Culture
6
Aloha Harvest

To rescue quality food to nourish and strengthen our community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
8
Hawaii Foodbank Inc

Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…

Food & Nutrition
9
Street Samaritans

Street samaritans is an illinois not for profit corporation incorporated in 2017. the purpose of the organization is to provide chicagoland's homeless population with fulfillment of their most pressing needs including food, water and…

Human Services
10
Bloodwater Mission Inc

Bloodwater mission, inc. (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization registered in nashville, tennessee that operates an international nonprofit that partners with african community-driven organizations to end water and hiv/aids…

Religion
11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Running Rebels Community Organization Inc; the most unlike its peers is Childrens Welfare and Development Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAWHIDE INC: $8,000 · OtherRAWHIDE INCMosquito Hill Nature Center: $8,000 · OtherMosquito Hill Nature CenterNAOMI House: $5,500 · OtherNAOMI HouseHeifer International: $4,500 · OtherHeifer InternationalSamaritan House of San Mateo: $4,500 · OtherSamaritan House of San MateoWISCONSIN BLACK HISTORAL SOCIE: $3,500 · OtherWISCONSIN BLACK HISTORAL SOCIERogers Behaviorial Health Foundation: $3,500 · OtherRogers Behaviorial Health FoundationHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $3,000 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCFRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER INC: $1,800 · Other+3 more: $2,500 · Other+3 moreCHILDRENS WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS WELFARE AND…STREET ANGELS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSTREET ANGELS INCSAWA SAWA COLLECTIVE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSAWA SAWA COLLECTIVE …THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CLINIC INC: $3,000 · HealthMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$44,800Human Services$12,500Health$3,000Food & Nutrition$2,500International$1,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDRENS WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $8,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN BLACK HISTORAL SOCIE: $3,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CLINIC INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTREET ANGELS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAWA SAWA COLLECTIVE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetRUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDRENS WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN BLACK HISTORAL SOCIE ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds STREET ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAWA SAWA COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds RUNNING REBELS COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dr James Cameron Legacy Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Victor Sumnicht Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Victor Sumnicht Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Victor Sumnicht’s filings →

    More from the funding graph