Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vicksburg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$302k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Recreation & Sports$352kEducation$284kCommunity Improvement$209kHousing & Shelter$142kHuman Services$127kArts & Culture$123kPhilanthropy$81kReligion$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
VILLAGE OF SCHOOLCRAFT$46,000
VICKSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$40,000
SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES$28,100
SCHOOLCRAFT HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
VICKSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$20,000
VICKSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
VICKSBURG CULTURAL ARTS CENTER$15,000
VICKSBURG COMM SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$13,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN$10,000
SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES$9,600
VICKSBURG COMM SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$8,261
SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES$6,100
VICKSBURG CULTURAL ARTS CENTER$5,000
FIRST DAY SHOE FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%KAIROS DWELLING: $15k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $8k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $5k → 12%FIRST DAY SHOE FUND: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$419k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
11

Total granted

$1.1M
$288k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+34%

Still filing today

41%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $81k · revenue +113%
  • VC
    VICKSBURG CULTURAL ARTS CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +124%
  • UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • SM
    SW MI MIRACLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • VU
    VICKSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN MIRACLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2022 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vicksburg Foundation
2
Vicksburg Foundation for Historic Preservation

Identify, preserve, protect, and interpret Vicksburg's historic built environment.

Arts & Culture
3
Kalamazoo Valley Community College Foundation

The kalamazoo valley community college foundation serves to support and benefit the kalamazoo valley community college, its students, faculty, staff and entities. the foundation strives to be a well recognized, managed, growing,…

Education
4
Vicksburg Athletic Boosters Club

To promote athletics in Vicksburg in both student athletes and coaches. To provide supplementary financial support for various athletic activities and facilities at Vicksburg Community Schools. To encourage and support academic endeavors…

Education
5
Kittitas County Historical Society
Arts & Culture
6
Karnes County Historical Society
7
Kankakee Community College Foundation

Scholarships and financial assistance to promote educational opportunities at kankakee community college

Education
8
Valley City State University Foundation

Valley City State University Foundation aids in the advancement of Valley City State University by awarding scholarships and by promoting the University. Support comes primarily from contributions by individuals and businesses, fundraising…

9
Kalispell Area Chamber of Commerce

Economic and community development

10
Van Buren County Victims Service Unit Inc

volunteer service agency providing support to those who have suffered a loss

Human Services
11
Kaskaskia College Foundation

To help students achieve their educational goals and make education more accessible to the communities that it serves by working with the college to provide scholarships and funding for special projects.

Education
12
Vermilion County Rape Crisis Center

Counsel and support victims of rape and sexual assault

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vicksburg Community Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bradley Jacob Dow Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $532,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSW MI MIRACLE LEAGUE — $100,000 · OtherSW MI MIRACLE LEAGUESOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES — $80,800 · OtherSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICESVICKSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $75,000 · OtherVICKSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCHVICKSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $60,000 · OtherVICKSBURG COMM SCHOOLS — $48,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF SCHOOLCRAFT — $46,000 · Other+14 more — $277,686 · Other+14 moreVICKSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $141,248 · EducationVICKSBURG C…VICKSBURG BAND BOOSTERS INC — $20,000 · EducationVICKSBURG B…VICKSBURG CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $59,896 · Arts & CultureVICKSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $27,629 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS — $11,050 · PhilanthropyFIRST DAY SHOE FUND — $17,500 · Human ServicesKAIROS DWELLING — $15,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRADLEY JACOB DOW FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Health
Other$1,220,194Education$161,248Arts & Culture$87,525Philanthropy$41,050Human Services$32,500Youth Development$5,000Health$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVICKSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $141,248 over 6y, 41% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES — $80,800 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetVICKSBURG CULTURAL ARTS CENTER — $59,896 over 4y, 22% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVICKSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $27,629 over 3y, 24% of budgetFIRST DAY SHOE FUND — $17,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetKAIROS DWELLING — $15,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS — $11,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VICKSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds VICKSBURG CULTURAL ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN
  • Who funds VICKSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds VICKSBURG BAND BOOSTERS INC
  • Who funds FIRST DAY SHOE FUND
  • Who funds KAIROS DWELLING
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds BRADLEY JACOB DOW FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kalamazoo Community FoundationMI26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vicksburg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vicksburg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vicksburg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph