· Public charity
Versiti Wisconsin Inc
Versiti wisconsin, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $3,956,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,046,177 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $89,427 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
- $250k+1 grant · $3.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VERSITI BLOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION | $3,810,000 |
| GREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUUNDATION INC | $129,750 |
| MARCUS PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| WISCONSIN STATE FAIR PARK FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
VERSITI BLOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $42M · revenue +103% · 58% of their budget- GLGREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $770k · revenue -4%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2019–2022 · $35k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- AAAmerican Association of Blood Banksone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +2%
- TMTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +40%
- HAHEMOSTASIS AND THROMBOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY INCone grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue -62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Saving lives through research, innovation, education and excellence in blood, medical and laboratory services in partnership with our community.
To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.
Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.
Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.
The wisconsin health information organization maintains a centralized health care data repository to provide data and information on the quality, safety, cost, and equity of health care to all health care stakeholders for improvement,…
Versiti michigan, inc. (versiti) is a blood health innovator which enhances lives through discovery, diagnosis and treatment. versiti expands the frontiers of patient health through the integration of science, medicine and service.
To advance the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting medical education and health initiatives.
Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Versiti wisconsin, inc. (versiti) is a blood health innovator which enhances lives through discovery, diagnosis and treatment. versiti expands the frontiers of patient health through the integration of science, medicine and service.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Versiti Blood Research Institute Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VERSITI BLOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds American Association of Blood Banks ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds HEMOSTASIS AND THROMBOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Wisconsin State Fair Park Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Versiti Wisconsin Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- American Association of Blood Banks — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.