Skip to content
Verrochi Family Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Verrochi Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$217kHealth$174kEducation$34kCivil Rights$31kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$13kEnvironment$9kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RODMAN RIDE FOR KIDS$25,000
INLY SCHOOL$5,000
KELLEHER FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,000
RALLY TO GIVE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
USS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM$5,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION NE$5,000
OMEGA NU OF SANTA CRUZ$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COHASSET HISTORICAL MILITARY MEM$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $250 → 17%CHILD FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%WELLSPRING: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 15 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
37

Total granted

$379k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    Rodman For Kids Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $215k · revenue +5%
  • RT
    RALLY TO GIVE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +10%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $21k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TI
    TEAM IMPACT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -3%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SM
    SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kelleher Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rodman For Kids Inc: $215,000 · PhilanthropyRodman For Kids IncTEAM IMPACT INC: $16,000 · PhilanthropyTEAM IMPACT INC+3 more: $13,500 · Philanthropy+3 moreCLERGY HEALTH & RETIREMENT TRUST: $75,000 · OtherCLERGY HEALTH & RETIREMENT TRUSTRALLY TO GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $30,750 · OtherRALLY TO GIVE FOUNDATION INCPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $20,500 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUND: $10,000 · Other+28 more: $72,715 · Other+28 moreBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $9,000 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $750 · Health+2 more: $1,025 · HealthCHILD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING INC: $500 · Human Services+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesUSS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureRosemary Youth Ballet: $1,750 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureDucks Unlimited Inc: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $3,175 · EnvironmentPLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION: $550 · Environment+1 more: $80 · EnvironmentGREEN VALE SCHOOL: $5,075 · Education
Philanthropy$244,500Other$218,965Health$22,275Human Services$11,000Arts & Culture$10,250Environment$8,805Education$5,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRodman For Kids Inc: $215,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetRALLY TO GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $30,750 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN VALE SCHOOL: $5,075 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINLY SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBATON ROUGE AREA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKelleher Family Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN W RICHARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLAR ATHLETES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUSS CONSTITUTION MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGimme Shelter Animal Rescue Inc: $3,975 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC: $3,175 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FROM FISTULA FOUNDATION US INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetUSTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLEDGE SCHOOL: $1,990 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosemary Youth Ballet: $1,750 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART AND HAND CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LINK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKAT'S RIBBON OF HOPE INC: $525 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWELLSPRING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY GARDEN CLUB OF LONG ISLAND INC: $80 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank Foundati…The Ayco Charitable F…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Morgan Stanley Global…The New York Communit…Boston Foundation IncGs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…The US Charitable Gif…Renaissance Charitabl…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…
Eastern Bank FoundationMA15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The New York Community Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Verrochi Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Verrochi Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Uss Constitution Museum Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Food Link Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wellspring Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Inly School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Studio Theatre Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Verrochi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home