Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$276kHealth$90kHuman Services$75kReligion$20k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WI$22,500
SHARING CENTER$2,200
ST FRANCIS DE SALES$1,500
TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY$1,500
PM&L THEATRE$1,500
LOAVES & FISHES$1,500
HELPING HANDS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$1,500
FISH OF MCHENRY$1,500
OPEN ARMS MISSION$1,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$1,500
ANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY$1,500
ST PETERS ST VINCENT DEPAUL$1,500
WARREN TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $5k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $4k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $4k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $4k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $3k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $6k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $3k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $5k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $2k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $2k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $3k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $1k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $3k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $2k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$402k · 20 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$402k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+55%

Still filing today

35%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • American Brain Tumor Association
    2× · 2019–2020 · $42k · revenue +32%
  • SC
    SHARING CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +551%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UP
    US PAIN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +55%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION GREATER IL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Antigo Area Community Food Pantry

Free food pantry. The Organization distributes free food to over 100 needy families per week, totaling almost 5000 visits per year. Over 70 individual volunteers receive, organize, and distribute over 200,000 pounds of food annually.

Food & Nutrition
3
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
4
Wauconda-Island Lake Food Pantry Inc

Distribute food to needy families and individuals.

Human Services
5
Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition
6
Geneseo-Atkinson Food Pantry

The Christian mission of the Geneseo-Atkinson food Pantry is to provide food, clothing, and short-term emergency assistance for families and individuals residing in Geneseo (61254) or Atkinson (61235) zip code areas.

—
7
Milan Christian Food Pantry

Providing food for people in need.

Food & Nutrition
8
Sauk Valley Foodbank

Our mission at the Sauk Valley Foodbank is to help alleviate food insecurity in the Sauk Valley area.

Food & Nutrition
9
Dubois Area Food Pantry Inc

Food and nonfood assistance to individuals

—
10
Watertown Food Pantry

Distribution of food to the needy residents in the City of Watertown and surrounding rural communities falling into the Watertown School District. Patrons may come every 30 days.

—
11
Elmhurst-Yorkfield Food Pantry

Provide food and other assistance to families and individuals in the western suburbs of chicago.

Food & Nutrition
12
Lockport Fish Food Pantry

The lockport fish food pantry is a non-profit organization, operated solely by volunteers. the pantry helps supplement food and essentials for individuals and families in need in lockport and homer townships in will county, illinois.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fish of Mchenry; the most unlike its peers is Community Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Brain Tumor Association: $42,000 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor AssociationIndividual grant recipient: $26,557 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARREN TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $26,000 · OtherWARREN TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRYHELPING HANDS: $26,000 · OtherHELPING HANDSOPEN ARMS MISSION: $26,000 · OtherOPEN ARMS MISSIONST PETERS ST VINCENT DEPAUL: $23,000 · OtherST PETERS ST VINCENT DEPAULRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WI: $22,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WIST FRANCIS DE SALES: $22,000 · OtherST FRANCIS DE SALESLOAVES FISHES: $20,400 · OtherLOAVES FISHESTHE CHAPPEL COMMUNITY CARE CENTER: $20,300 · OtherTHE CHAPPEL COMMUNITY CARE CENTERANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILI: $11,700 · Other+8 more: $34,275 · Other+8 moreSHARING CENTER INC: $31,700 · Human ServicesSHARING CENTER INCTWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesTWIN LAKES AREA FOOD…FISH OF MCHENRY: $26,000 · Human ServicesFISH OF MCHENRYUS PAIN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC: $5,600 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $26,000 · Food & NutritionSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL: $20,300 · Religion
Other$300,732Human Services$83,700Health$30,600Food & Nutrition$26,000Religion$20,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $42,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHARING CENTER INC: $31,700 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $26,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetTWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $26,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetFISH OF MCHENRY: $26,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetUS PAIN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL: $20,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC: $5,600 over 2y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds SHARING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF MCHENRY ↗
  • Who funds US PAIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vern & Bunny Thelen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph