Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$276kHealth$90kHuman Services$75kReligion$20k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WI$22,500
SHARING CENTER$2,200
ST FRANCIS DE SALES$1,500
PM&L THEATRE$1,500
ST PETERS ST VINCENT DEPAUL$1,500
LOAVES & FISHES$1,500
HELPING HANDS$1,500
FISH OF MCHENRY$1,500
WARREN TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
THE CHAPPEL COMMUNITY CARE CENTER$1,500
OPEN ARMS MISSION$1,500
COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$1,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$1,500
ANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $5k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $4k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $4k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 10%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $4k → 6%TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $3k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $6k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $3k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $5k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $2k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $2k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $3k → 10%FISH OF MCHENRY: $1k → 6%SHARING CENTER: $3k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $2k → 10%SHARING CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$402k · 20 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$402k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+55%

Still filing today

35%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • American Brain Tumor Association
    2× · 2019–2020 · $42k · revenue +21%
  • SC
    SHARING CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +551%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • UP
    US PAIN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +55%
  • AA
    ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION GREATER IL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Antigo Area Community Food Pantry

Free food pantry. The Organization distributes free food to over 100 needy families per week, totaling almost 5000 visits per year. Over 70 individual volunteers receive, organize, and distribute over 200,000 pounds of food annually.

Food & Nutrition
3
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
4
Wauconda-Island Lake Food Pantry Inc

Distribute food to needy families and individuals.

Human Services
5
Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition
6
Geneseo-Atkinson Food Pantry

The Christian mission of the Geneseo-Atkinson food Pantry is to provide food, clothing, and short-term emergency assistance for families and individuals residing in Geneseo (61254) or Atkinson (61235) zip code areas.

7
Milan Christian Food Pantry

Providing food for people in need.

Food & Nutrition
8
Sauk Valley Foodbank

Our mission at the Sauk Valley Foodbank is to help alleviate food insecurity in the Sauk Valley area.

Food & Nutrition
9
Dubois Area Food Pantry Inc

Food and nonfood assistance to individuals

10
Watertown Food Pantry

Distribution of food to the needy residents in the City of Watertown and surrounding rural communities falling into the Watertown School District. Patrons may come every 30 days.

11
Elmhurst-Yorkfield Food Pantry

Provide food and other assistance to families and individuals in the western suburbs of chicago.

Food & Nutrition
12
Lockport Fish Food Pantry

The lockport fish food pantry is a non-profit organization, operated solely by volunteers. the pantry helps supplement food and essentials for individuals and families in need in lockport and homer townships in will county, illinois.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fish of Mchenry and the most unlike its peers is Community Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American Brain Tumor Association — $42,000 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor AssociationIndividual grant recipient — $26,557 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARREN TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY — $26,000 · OtherWARREN TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRYHELPING HANDS — $26,000 · OtherHELPING HANDSOPEN ARMS MISSION — $26,000 · OtherOPEN ARMS MISSIONST PETERS ST VINCENT DEPAUL — $23,000 · OtherST PETERS ST VINCENT DEPAULRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WI — $22,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE EASTERN WIST FRANCIS DE SALES — $22,000 · OtherST FRANCIS DE SALESLOAVES FISHES — $20,400 · OtherLOAVES FISHESTHE CHAPPEL COMMUNITY CARE CENTER — $20,300 · OtherTHE CHAPPEL COMMUNITY CARE CENTERANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILI — $11,700 · Other+8 more — $34,275 · Other+8 moreSHARING CENTER INC — $31,700 · Human ServicesSHARING CENTER INCTWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $26,000 · Human ServicesTWIN LAKES AREA FOOD…FISH OF MCHENRY — $26,000 · Human ServicesFISH OF MCHENRYUS PAIN FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · HealthANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC — $5,600 · HealthCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $26,000 · Food & NutritionSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL — $20,300 · Religion
Other$300,732Human Services$83,700Health$30,600Food & Nutrition$26,000Religion$20,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $42,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSHARING CENTER INC — $31,700 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $26,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetTWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $26,000 over 9y, 18% of budgetFISH OF MCHENRY — $26,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetUS PAIN FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL — $20,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC — $5,600 over 2y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association
  • Who funds SHARING CENTER INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds TWIN LAKES AREA FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds FISH OF MCHENRY
  • Who funds US PAIN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL
  • Who funds ANTIOCH AREA HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY ALLIANCE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vern & Bunny Thelen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph