How much did VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH grant in FY2023?

VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH reported 25 grants totaling $2,560,796 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH based?

VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH is based in VT.

VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH

The VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH association (vtpha) is a membership organization whose purpose is to protect and promote personal, community and environmental health within the state of vermont.

$2.6M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$489k

Largest

01What you fund

0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2023.

Health$1.4MPhilanthropy$330kHuman Services$270kPublic Safety & Disaster$73kCrime & Legal$28kInternational$21kArts & Culture$13kCivil Rights$9kOther$776k

02FY2023 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k12 grants · $232k
$50k–250k11 grants · $1.8M
$250k+1 grant · $489k

$28,800

Median grant

States reached

$123k

Total assets

Largest grants

NORTHERN COUNTY HEALTH CARE INC$489,105
PUBLIC HEALTH COUNCIL OF UPP VALLEY$243,955
UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VT INC$235,104
SOCIAL TINKERING$218,730
PORTER MEDICAL CENTER INC$216,717
BENNINGTON COUNTRY REGIONAL COMM$206,706
SOUTHEASTERN VT COMMUNITY ACTION$201,900
LAMOILLE HEALTH PARTNERS INC$184,472
WASHINGTON COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH$126,376
COMMUNITY RESILIENCE ORGANIZATIONS$73,467
CENTRAL VT MEDICAL CENTER INC$70,937
UNITED WAY OF WINDHAM COUNTY$52,653
OUT IN THE OPEN INC$28,800
VERMONTERS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REF$28,229
NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS$27,046

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.3M · 9 repeat orgs$602k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.3M

$602k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+43%

Still filing today

89%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $602k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NC
NORTHERN COUNTY HEALTH CARE INC
2× · 2022–2023 · $568k · revenue +45%
PH
PUBLIC HEALTH COUNCIL OF UPP VALLEY
2× · 2022–2023 · $268k · revenue +100% · 47% of their budget
SV
SOUTHEASTERN VT COMMUNITY ACTION
2× · 2022–2023 · $231k · revenue +66%

Funded once

PM
PORTER MEDICAL CENTER INC
one grant, 2023 · $217k · revenue +17%
CR
COMMUNITY RESILIENCE ORGANIZATIONSgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $73k · revenue +370%
CV
CENTRAL VT MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $71k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Southern Vermont Area Health

Enhancing community efforts to obtain, maintain and retain the primary healthcare workforce in southern Vermont.

Health

Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice of Vermont and New Hampshire Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—

The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health

Sebasticook Valley Health

Sebasticook Valley Health d/b/a Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital is a critical access hospital whose mission is to be the regional leader in meeting the health needs of our communities, providing quality care, always treating…

Health

Valley Health Connections

To provide medical and dental referral services and enrollment services to low income populations in Vermont who are uninsured, underinsured, or at risk of losing insurance

Health

University of Vermont and State

The mission of the uvm foundation is to secure and manage private support for the benefit of the university of vermont.

Education

Vermont Community Garden Network Inc

Our mission is to cultivate well-being by helping people of all ages access resources to grow food, build confidence and connect with each other. Our goals are to increase access to gardening resources, develop outreach and education…

Environment

Vermont Public Co

To broaden and diversify our audience through relevant, trusted information and stories that bring people and communities together.

Arts & Culture

Vermont Council On Rural Development Inc

The Vermont Council on Rural Development helps Vermont citizens build prosperous and resilient communities through democratic engagement, marshalling resources, and collective action.

Community Improvement

Vermont Psychological Services

Provide psychology & counseling to members of society who display behvaior & psychological problems.

Health

Southwestern Vermont Council on Aging Inc

The Southwestern Vermont Council on Aging exists to be a community force in creating and sustaining opportunities for elders and caregivers in our region to help assure that elders are able to maintain maximum independence and quality of…

Human Services

Alyssum Inc

To provide a peer-operated holistic approach to mental wellness and recovery for vermonters who are experiencing mental health crisis.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Connections Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lamoille Health Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

14/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$1,363,560Other$798,253Philanthropy$330,392Human Services$270,197Public Safety & Disaster$73,467Crime & Legal$28,229International$21,103

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT41× affinity18 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Vermont Foodbank · Td Charitable Foundation · Thomas Thompson Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOCIAL TINKERING.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 863445827 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SOCIAL TINKERING, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 80% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Vermont Public Health?

Find your warmest path to Vermont Public Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vermont Public Health?

More from the funding graph

VERMONT PUBLIC HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Vermont Public Health?

More from the funding graph