Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Veritas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$369k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$2.1MReligion$1.2MRecreation & Sports$100kInternational$35kHuman Services$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $328k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHESTERTON ACADEMY$125,000
FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA MENS GYMNASTICS$100,000
UNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$53,000
RIVERTREE SCHOOL$50,000
CHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIES OF DULUTH$27,500
Individual grant recipient$8,000
HOSPITALITY CENTER$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DOOR OF HOPE REDEEMING LIVES RESTORING FAMILES: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 13 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$3.2M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
-1%

Still filing today

31%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HAND IN HAND CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI
    2× · 2019–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +102% · 41% of their budget
  • CA
    CHESTERTON ACADEMY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $375k · revenue +46%
  • RS
    RIVERTREE SCHOOL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $351k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • TT
    Transformation Today
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -15%
  • SC
    SOJOURN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • GS
    GLOBAL STUDENT INITIATIVES GF CHI ALPHA
    one grant, 2018 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

4
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
5
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

6
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
7
Ministries of the Son of God

Mission work overseas

Religion
8
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
9
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
10
Oasis Ministries
Religion
11
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
12
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Door of Hope Redeeming Lives Restoring Families and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Minnesota Men's Gymnasti Mannon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAND IN HAND CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI — $1,300,000 · EducationHAND IN HAND CHRISTIAN MONTESSORICHESTERTON ACADEMY — $375,000 · EducationCHESTERTON ACADEMYRIVERTREE SCHOOL — $351,000 · EducationRIVERTREE SCHOOLUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP — $403,691 · OtherUNIVERSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPCHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIES OF DULUTH — $305,275 · OtherCHI ALPHA CAMPUS MINISTRIES OF DU…CHURCH OF THE CROSS — $125,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE CROSS+11 more — $168,100 · Other+11 moreOASIS WORLD MINISTRIES INC — $225,000 · ReligionOASIS WOR…Transformation Today — $40,000 · ReligionTransform…SEG-WAY MINISTRIES — $15,600 · ReligionSEG-WAY M…FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA MEN'S GYMNASTI MANNON — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsCompassion International Incorporated — $25,000 · InternationalDOOR OF HOPE REDEEMING LIVES RESTORING FAMILIES — $500 · Human Services
Education$2,026,000Other$1,002,066Religion$280,600Recreation & Sports$100,000International$25,000Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAND IN HAND CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI — $1,300,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY — $375,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetRIVERTREE SCHOOL — $351,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetOASIS WORLD MINISTRIES INC — $225,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetFRIENDS OF MINNESOTA MEN'S GYMNASTI MANNON — $100,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEG-WAY MINISTRIES — $15,600 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE REDEEMING LIVES RESTORING FAMILIES — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAND IN HAND CHRISTIAN MONTESSORI
  • Who funds CHESTERTON ACADEMY
  • Who funds RIVERTREE SCHOOL
  • Who funds OASIS WORLD MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA MEN'S GYMNASTI MANNON
  • Who funds Transformation Today
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds SEG-WAY MINISTRIES
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE REDEEMING LIVES RESTORING FAMILIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Veritas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph