Skip to content
Vassar Brothers Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Vassar Brothers Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

$197k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $137,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $196,710 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $59,210 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$20,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$20,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$20,000
SPARROW'S NEST$20,000
FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
WALKWAY OVER THE HUDSON$15,000
DUTCHESS OUTREACH$10,000
PREMIER CARES FOUNDATION$10,000
DUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $10k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 8 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$232k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +26%
  • MO
    MILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +12%
  • SN
    SPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY
    2× · 2018–2025 · $34k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • DC
    DUTCHESS COUNTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue -46%
  • PF
    PLAY FOR PINK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +41%
  • HV
    Hudson Valley Hospice Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +251%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
2
Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention

The Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention was incorporated in 2002 in the State of New York as a non-for-profit organization to provide individuals, many of whom are medically underserved - with access to the highest quality…

—
3
Breast Cancer Network of Western New Yorkinc

Our mission is to support the well being of all western new yorkers impacted by breast cancer.

Health
4
Nassau Suffolk Hospital Council Inc

& part iii, line 1: the mission of the nassau-suffolk hospital council, inc. (nshc) is to:- provide a forum for the exchange of ideas regarding the development of regional, state, and national health policy,- identify key policy issues…

—
5
Vassar Brothers Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—
7
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
8
Visiting Nurse Association of Hudson Valley Inc

Vna of hudson valley was formed to provide home health care to the people of westchester county. services include nursing; physical, occupational and speech therapy; medical social services; and home health aides. our mission is to provide…

Health
9
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
10
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
11
Hudson Headwaters Health Network

We are a community based health clinic which provides comprehensive health care services to the general population of warren, washington, saratoga, hamilton, essex, clinton, and franklin counties. to promote, sponsor, foster and deliver…

Health
12
Southwestern Vermont Health Care Corporation

To care for and comfort our patients, residents, and their loved ones and to improve the health status of the communities we serve. the purpose of the organization is also to promote and support the development and maintenance of a highly…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dutchess County Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Heart Association Inc: $37,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $37,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $33,600 · HealthMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INCPremier Cares Foundation Inc: $16,800 · HealthPremier Cares Foundation IncFAMILY SERVICES INC: $32,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES INCDUTCHESS COUNTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $17,000 · OtherDUTCHESS COUNTY REGION…ULSTER COUNTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $5,100 · OtherULSTER COUNTY REGIONAL…SPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $33,600 · Food & NutritionSPARROW'S NES…THE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD: $25,200 · Arts & CultureTHE POUGHKEE…O POSITIVE FESTIVAL INC: $5,100 · Arts & CultureO POSITIVE F…DUTCHESS OUTREACH INC: $16,800 · Human ServicesDUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · EducationHudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc: $5,100 · EducationPLAY FOR PINK INC: $6,800 · Crime & Legal
Health$124,400Other$54,100Food & Nutrition$33,600Arts & Culture$30,300Human Services$16,800Education$12,600Crime & Legal$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $37,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $37,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILES OF HOPE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $33,600 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $33,600 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $32,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE POUGHKEEPSIE-HIGHLAND RAILROAD: $25,200 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $17,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPremier Cares Foundation Inc: $16,800 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetDUTCHESS OUTREACH INC: $16,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $6,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc: $5,100 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetULSTER COUNTY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetO POSITIVE FESTIVAL INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Health Quest Systems …Nuvance HealthCommunity Foundations…Ulster Savings Charit…James J McCann Charit…Jane W Nuhn Charitabl…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Health Quest Systems IncNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Health Quest Systems Inc · Nuvance Health · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · James J McCann Charitable Trust · Jane W Nuhn Charitable Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vassar Brothers Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vassar Brothers Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vassar Brothers Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home