Skip to content

· Public charity

Vantage West Credit Union

Working together to meet our members' financial needs.

$256k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$105kPublic Benefit$48kFood & Nutrition$27kPhilanthropy$22kHuman Services$15kHealth$10kReligion$10kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $97,917, the rows itemized in this filing. The $255,573 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $157,656 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES$25,000
FILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTION INC$22,917
GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION CENTER OF OPPORTUNITY$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUCSON$10,000
YOUTH ON THEIR OWN$10,000
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT CORPORATION$10,000
THE PRIMAVERA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LA FRONTERA: $5k → 15%EARN TO LEARN: $5k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Southern Az Inc

Goodwill Industries of Southern Arizona works toward ensuring that all people have the opportunity to reach their potential and contribute to our community. Through quality, evidence-based, workforce development programs; Goodwill…

—
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
4
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
5
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
6
Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The Tucson Metro Chamber is a membership-based business advocacy and community development organization that represents 1,500 businesses employing more than 160,000 employees in Tucson and Pima County. The Tucson Metro Chamber is committed…

—
7
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
8
Tmm Family Services Inc

TMM's mission is to provide quality affordale housing, essential education, and stabiliity for qualifying low-income seniors, single parents, and veterans within the Greater Tucson area.

—
9
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
10
Education Forward Arizona

To advocate for high-quality education and training that aligns with career and workforce opportunities to advance the quality of life for all arizonans.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity Central Arizona

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

—
12
Southern Arizona Leadership Council Inc

To improve greater tucson and the state of arizona by bringing together resources and leadership to enhance the economic climate and quality of life in our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Housing Resources Inc; the most unlike its peers is La Frontera Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES INCThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Primavera Foundation IncHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity Tucson IncTUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $27,230 · OtherTUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTR…CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE OF TUCSON: $12,200 · OtherCATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE…GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC: $10,000 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $7,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSO…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $5,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZO…FILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $47,917 · Public BenefitFILENE RESEARCH INSTI…YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10,000 · Human ServicesLIVE THE SOLUTION DBA EARN TO LEARN: $5,000 · Human ServicesLa Frontera Center Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $10,000 · Health
Housing & Shelter$95,000Other$61,930Public Benefit$47,917Human Services$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY HOUSING RESOURCES INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFILENE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $47,917 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE THE SOLUTION DBA EARN TO LEARN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLa Frontera Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · InterVol Inc · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vantage West Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vantage West Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vantage West Credit Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph