Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vander Ploeg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$850kEducation$194kInternational$54kHuman Services$36kHealth$26kArts & Culture$18kRecreation & Sports$13kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$50,000
SALT CHURCH$27,500
HOUSES WITH HOPE$25,000
CAMPUS LIFE INC OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY$23,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OOSTBURG$17,000
Individual grant recipient$17,000
AMAZIMA MINISTRIES$10,000
FIRST REFORMED CHURCH$8,000
ROCKPOINT CHURCH$7,500
WORDS OF HOPE$6,000
KALAMAZOO VALLEY GLEANERS$5,000
DEMENTIA INNOVATIONS INC$5,000
PAWS WITH A CAUSE$5,000
CRU$5,000
SHEPHERD'S STAFF MISSION FACILITATORS INC$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRISM: $1k → 11%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $10k → 10%GOD'S TREASURES: $1k → 14%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $10k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $6k → 10%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
TN
NC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 45 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
23

Total granted

$1.3M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+35%

Still filing today

33%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CAMPUS LIFE INC OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $92k · revenue +12%
  • AM
    Amazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +10%
  • SS
    Shepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHEBOYGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • DS
    DESERT SPRINGS COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • OA
    OOSTBURG ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
3
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

4
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

5
Joy in the Harvest

To serve Christ by providing expertise, resources, and leadership to help the church make Christian Disciples in foreign lands, and to render assistance to the poor, sick, and needy in our places of service.

Religion
6
Worldlink International Ministries

Promoting and spreading the good news of jesus christ by expanding, equipping and encouraging the world's indigenous workforce.

Religion
7
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
8
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
9
Christian Care Management Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

10
Gull Lake Ministries

Gull lake ministries provides bible based, christian retreats year-round for families, churches and organizations where we exalt jesus and share his truth.

Religion
11
Pilgrim Africa

Pilgrim Africa's mission is to challenge despair, love boldly, and help African people create a future of sustainable prosperity and health. We give ourselves in service to others regardless of economic, religious, or social standing,…

International
12
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Educational Media Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Youth CampsAffordable Housing Developm…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%8%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr19%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%10%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr19%32%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/43
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,483

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $157,500 · OtherOOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $122,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMPUS LIFE INC OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY — $91,500 · OtherCAMPUS LIFE INC OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTYOOSTBURG 1ST REFORMED CHURCH — $90,100 · OtherOOSTBURG 1ST REFORMED CHURCHORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH COMMITTEE ON MINISTERIAL CARE — $68,500 · OtherORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH COMMITTEE ON MINISTERIAL CARESALT CHURCH — $67,500 · OtherSALT CHURCHFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OOSTBURG — $59,000 · OtherNEW HOPE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $56,000 · OtherFIRST REFORMED CHURCH — $53,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $48,000 · OtherSUMMIT COMMUNITY CHURCH — $40,000 · Other+45 more — $274,120 · Other+45 moreAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East — $80,000 · InternationalPARTNERS WORLDWIDE — $3,200 · International+1 more — $1,950 · InternationalHOUSES WITH HOPE INC — $50,000 · HealthDEMENTIA INNOVATIONS INC — $10,000 · HealthHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC — $3,150 · Health+2 more — $1,000 · HealthPaws With A Cause — $31,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesShepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc — $25,400 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 · Religion+1 more — $500 · ReligionNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $6,600 · EducationOOSTBURG COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO VALLEY GLEANERS INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,127,720International$85,150Health$64,150Human Services$33,000Religion$26,900Education$8,600Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMPUS LIFE INC OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY — $91,500 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East — $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSES WITH HOPE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetPaws With A Cause — $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetShepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc — $25,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE LUNDGREN BIBLE CAMP — $13,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDEMENTIA INNOVATIONS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — $6,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S HAND INC — $4,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC — $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS WORLDWIDE — $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE STREET MINISTRY INC — $3,150 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE HAVEN CHRISTIAN HOME FOUNDATION INC — $2,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOOSTBURG COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S TREASURES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE RESPONDING IN SOCIAL MINISTRY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Renew — $920 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST AVIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMPUS LIFE INC OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY
  • Who funds Amazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East
  • Who funds HOUSES WITH HOPE INC
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause
  • Who funds Shepherds Staff Mission Fac Inc
  • Who funds LAKE LUNDGREN BIBLE CAMP
  • Who funds DEMENTIA INNOVATIONS INC
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO VALLEY GLEANERS INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S HAND INC
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds HOPE STREET MINISTRY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barnabas FoundationIL15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barnabas Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Merle & Sheri Dewitt Foundation · The Richard and Helen Devos Foundation · Randall J & Judith F Hake Family Foundation Inc · Marvin G & Jerene L Dewitt Family Foundation · Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vander Ploeg Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vander Ploeg Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Vander Ploeg Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph