· Private foundation
Van Sloun Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k39 grants · $129k
- $10k–50k44 grants · $685k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $397k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUSTEES UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $175,000 |
| FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH | $60,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $56,800 |
| ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE | $55,000 |
| SOUTHCOAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| NAVITY PREPATORY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| OUR SISTERS' SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| AMERICA'S VETDOGS | $24,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $24,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $21,000 |
| MASS AUDUBON | $20,000 |
| NEW BEDFORD STAR KIDS | $20,000 |
| BLITHEWOLD INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $334k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $629k · revenue +105%
- ALALICE LLOYD COLLEGE8× · 2017–2024 · $360k · revenue +152%
- FHFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $21k
- CFCOASTAL FOODSHEDgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +282%
- DMDennison Memorial Community Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +127%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meeting Street and the most unlike its peers is Animal Rescue League of Fall River. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF FALL RIVER ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLITHEWOLD INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHCOAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds OUR SISTERS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT RIVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INSTRIDE THERAPY INC ↗
- Who funds Meeting Street ↗
- Who funds LLOYD CENTER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NEADS INC ↗
- Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) ↗
- Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grimshaw-Gudewicz Charitable Foundation A Shabshelowitz Co-Trustee · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Philip Snyder Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Van Sloun Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Coastal Foodshed — 66% of income from government
- The Family Pantry- Damien's Place — 36% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Dennison Memorial Community Center Inc — 21% of income from government
- National Marine Life Center Inc — 16% of income from government
- Thrive Central Oregon — 12% of income from government
- Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc — 12% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Southcoast Community Foundation Inc — 10% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- Evkids Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lloyd Center for the Environment Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fall River Historical Society — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bentley University — 1% of income from government
- Marion Art Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
- The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Van Sloun Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Van Sloun Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.