How much did PHILIP SNYDER FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of PHILIP SNYDER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

middlechurchmethodistriver alumnibedfordmuseumlibrary

2019

middlemethodistrescuemuseumlibraryfall rivergreater fall

2020

churchlibrarybedfordmuseumnashvillefall rivergreater fall

2021

massmuseumgreater

2022

livinggeneraloperations

2023

angelgeneraloperationsnashvillechildrenyouth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k61 grants · $86k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

COLLAGEN 6 RESEARCH CHARITY INC$10,000
NORWICH UNIVERSITY$6,000
ST ANDREWS SCHOOL$6,000
LINDEN WALDORF SCHOOL$5,500
CHUKKERS FOR CHARITY CO$5,050
STAR KIDS SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$5,000
WAVERLY BELMONT PTO$3,500
BELCOURT THEATRE$3,125
THOMAS CHEW BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$3,000
THE TOMORROW FUND OF RHODE$2,500
KATIE BROWN FOUNDATION$2,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$2,000
SOUTHCOAST VNA$1,505
THRIVE OUTSIDE$1,500
SALVATION ARMY OF FALL RIVER$1,250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$638k · 101 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

101 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

101

Total granted

$638k

$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%

+32%

Still filing today

38%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

C6
COLLAGEN 6 RESEARCH CHARITY INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $121k · revenue +22100% · 40% of their budget
NU
NORWICH UNIVERSITY
8× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +17%
SA
ST ANDREWS SCHOOL
8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +8%

Funded once

AF
AMERICAN FUNDRAISING FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -75%
C
CBBTSNE
one grant, 2017 · $5k
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FALL RIVER
one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Westerly Land Trust

The westerly land trust conserves open space, revitalizes culturally significant properties and provides environmental programs for the enduring benefit of our community.

—

Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

Land conservation in nantucket, massachusetts

Environment

Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment

Connecticut Aeronautical Historical

To present the story of aviation and the human genius that made it possible

Arts & Culture

Wildlands Trust Inc

Wildlands trust, inc. protects natural areas throughout southeastern massachusetts for the benefit of wildlife and people. we work to permanently protect and steward important habitats and landscapes that characterize the natural heritage…

Environment

The Water Research Foundation

Advancing the science of water to improve the quality of life.

Environment

Westchester Childrens Museum

The westchester children's museum is a vibrant, interactive learning space, learning laboratory providing children, families and school groups the opportunity to nurture curiosity, enhance knowledge and ignite imagination through creative…

Arts & Culture

Brighton Marine Inc

To ensure quality health care is delivered to uniformed service beneficiaries.

Health

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—

Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

We are ct's only locally owned media organization producing tv, radio, print and internet content with a mix of educational, new, public affairs, children's and entertainment programming.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Fall River Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Andrew's School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/59

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,506

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

54/57

Grantees still filing

45/57

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$357,205Health$138,950Education$120,950Environment$25,090Arts & Culture$21,125Youth Development$19,750Philanthropy$11,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Southcoast Community Foundation IncMA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle · Bristol County Savings Charitable · Memorial Foundation Inc · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Grimshaw-Gudewicz Charitable Foundation A Shabshelowitz Co-Trustee · The Frist Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Fall River Women's Union · Thomas a Rodgers Jr Family Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PHILIP SNYDER FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COLLAGEN 6 RESEARCH CHARITY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 222.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 844216554 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on COLLAGEN 6 RESEARCH CHARITY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Philip Snyder Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Philip Snyder Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PHILIP SNYDER FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Philip Snyder Foundation?

More from the funding graph

PHILIP SNYDER FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

57 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Philip Snyder Foundation?

More from the funding graph