Skip to content

· Private foundation

Van Der Wansem Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2021
16
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Van Der Wansem Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Van Der Wansem Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $33k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’21
1
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$102kInternational$19kEducation$9kArts & Culture$5kEnvironment$3kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$2k
02FY2021 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$764k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$4,000
WORLDREADER$3,000
HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT$3,000
WAR CHILD USA$3,000
THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER$2,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PSE$2,000
HEALTH LAW ADVOCATES$2,000
ROOM TO READ$2,000
CONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$2,000
HOUSEHOLD GOODS RECYCLING MINISTRY$2,000
ROOM TO READ$2,000
ADVANCING GIRLS' EDUCATION IN AFRICA$2,000
NEW ENGLAND INTERNATIONAL DONORS$1,000
ORGANIZATION FOR THE ASSABET RIVER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HEALTH LAW ADVOCATES: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 3 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +146% since the first grant, against +65% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$13k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+146%
+65%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +20%
  • TU
    THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER
    2× · 2021–2023 · $5k
  • IM
    ICON MUSEUM AND STUDY CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $750 · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • RT
    ROOM TO READ
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue -16%
  • W
    WORLDREADER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • WC
    WAR CHILD USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +521%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Harvard Global Research and Support Services Inc

The corporation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended. specifically, the corporation has been formed for the…

Education
4
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
5
Orcid Inc

Orcid provides an identifier for individuals to use with their name as they engage in research, scholarship, and innovation activities. we provide open tools that enable transparent and trustworthy connections between researchers, their…

Education
6
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
7
GIVE2ASIA

Give2asia provides philanthropic services to individuals, foundations, corporations and charitable organizations in the united states and asia. give2asia matches donor interests and grantee mission and capacity to make international…

International
8
Amnesty International of the Usa Inc

Amnesty international of the usa, inc. is the united states section of amnesty international - a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights. (continued on schedule o).organization's mission…

International
9
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
10
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
11
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
12
University Studies Abroad Consortium

The mission of universities studies abroad consortium ("usac") is to provide students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to succeed in the global society of the 21st century. we strive to provide an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Icon Museum and Study Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $100,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…WAR CHILD USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalWAR CHILD US…HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $3,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CA…ADVANCING GIRLS EDUCATION IN AFRICA INC: $2,000 · InternationalADVANCING GI…THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER: $4,500 · OtherTHE UMBRE…WORLDREADER: $3,000 · OtherWORLDREAD…TOWN OF CONCORD TAX RELIEF FUND: $2,000 · OtherTOWN OF C…HOUSEHOLD GOODS RECYCLING MINISTRY: $2,000 · OtherHOUSEHOLD…ORGANIZATION FOR THE ASSABET RIVER: $500 · OtherROOM TO READ: $4,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $2,000 · EducationCONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY CORPORATION: $2,000 · EducationHEALTH LAW ADVOCATES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF ENGAGED INTERNATIONAL DONORS GLOBAL INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PSE: $2,000 · PhilanthropyICON MUSEUM AND STUDY CENTER INC: $750 · Philanthropy
Community Improvement$100,000International$16,000Other$12,000Education$8,000Human Services$3,000Philanthropy$2,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAR CHILD USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH LAW ADVOCATES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVANCING GIRLS EDUCATION IN AFRICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNETWORK OF ENGAGED INTERNATIONAL DONORS GLOBAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetICON MUSEUM AND STUDY CENTER INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Van Der Wansem Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Van Der Wansem Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Health Law Advocates Inc: 56% of income from government
  • Network of Engaged International Donors Global Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Himalayan Cataract Project Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Van Der Wansem’s filings →

More from the funding graph